✅ SOLVED .69 Caliber Musket Identification

coinman123

Silver Member
Feb 21, 2013
4,659
5,769
New England, Somewhere Metal Detecting in the Wood
🥇 Banner finds
2
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Teknetics T2 SE (DST)
Spare Teknetics T2 SE (backup)
15" T2 coil
Pro-Pointer
Bounty Hunter Pioneer 202
Fisher F2
Fisher F-Point
Primary Interest:
Other
I bought this musket today for 160 dollars, my first firearm. It looks to be converted into a percussion cap musket, from a flintlock one. Very ornate, around 57 or 58 inches long. Very cool to actually have a gun that could have fired the musket balls I find.

DSC_0314.JPGDSC_0321.JPGDSC_0322.JPGDSC_0315.JPGDSC_0317.JPGDSC_0318.JPGDSC_0324.JPG
 

Nice....Do you plan on shooting it ? Is it a replica ?
 

Upvote 0
Nice....Do you plan on shooting it ? Is it a replica ?

Thanks! It's authentic, with the wood in pretty rough shape with big gouges and a crack or two in the barrel stock. That just gives it character in my opinion though. I don't want to risk shooting it though, scared it would blow up on me. Any ideas on age?
 

Upvote 0
Upvote 0
I dont have any knowledge on flintlock or cap muskets.But I do know companies that sell reproduction kits will have the stock if & when you decide to replace it.A friend of mine bought & sold & put them together for 50 years.And some you cant tell the difference.Sure someone here with knowledge will chime in.
 

Upvote 0
Octagon to round barrel with wedding ring transition.
Is it smooth bore or rifled?
A Cocker Glasgow half stock rifle build has some similarities. The back action lock ,and the pineapple end shape on the trigger guards front. ( Pineapples had meaning back when.) Though similar ,still different. The snail,around the nipple ,even the shape of pineapple differ from your piece. But the engraved guard and design hint of a similar school..
 

Upvote 0
It's a back action cap lock, and no, it's not a conversion from flint. It was made that way. The back action is an invention a little later than the flint lock era. They are a fraction of a second faster than the traditional lock. I suspect, without seeing the muzzle of your gun, that is a "fowler." That just means it was built as a shotgun for hunting ducks etc.
Another thing, just because J. Bishop is on the lock, does not mean he made the gun, it generally means he made the lock. The gun maker generally had his name on the barrel, and if made in Europe, there would be proof marks on the barrel.
Are you positive it's .69 caliber? Did you measure the barrel?
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
Nice piece!! You got a deal. Names on old guns can be misleading. We had a master gunsmith in our area that is quite famous locally. I got a chance to do some repair on one of his percussion rifles for a family member. It had his name on top of the barrel, but on the bottom was a company from Pennsylvania. The lock was from New York. I didn't show the relative what I had found.
 

Upvote 0
Nice piece. Something that old should never be fired. However, if you decide to fire it please give me all the information for me to take out life and disability insurance on you. No, they really are best left unfired.
 

Upvote 0
It may have a Damascus steel barrell. You might want to check into that.
 

Upvote 0
This might help people that aren't familiar with muzzle loading firearms.
lock.jpg
This first picture is a flint lock. The hammer is down, directly under the flint is the "pan" for the priming powder. The "frizzen" is open. When priming powder is in the pan, the frizzen is closed. Note the spring that holds the frizzen either open or closed. That V shaped spring rules out any back action lock from having been a flint lock. Even if the lock was changed and a back action added later, the cut out inlet for the front of the flintlock would still be in the wood part of the stock.
lock1.jpg
This looks to me like a lock that has been converted from flint to cap lock. It looks like there are some remains of the frizzen, and there is evidence that there was a frizzen spring.
lock3.jpg
This is another side action lock. The location of the drum and nipple, and the hole in the forward part of the lock makes it possible that this could also be a conversion from flint to caplock. But inexpensive caplock rifles were also built using a drum and nipple, so sometimes it's hard to tell if it's a conversion or not.
 

Attachments

  • lock2.JPG
    lock2.JPG
    184.3 KB · Views: 65
Last edited:
Upvote 0
That type of lock first came around in the 1830's as I remember, so no older than that. Muzzle loaders were pretty much obsolete by the 1870's so no newer than that, I would imagine more toward the earlier end of those dates
 

Upvote 0
That type of lock first came around in the 1830's as I remember, so no older than that. Muzzle loaders were pretty much obsolete by the 1870's so no newer than that, I would imagine more toward the earlier end of those dates

My guess is circa 1840, give or take 5 or 10 years either way, based on what I have heard from you guys and researched off of that information. How does that sound to you as an approximate manufacturing date? Thanks for all of the great info guys, going to try to make a display mount for the gun soon.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Sorry for my ignorance, but how do you tell the difference between a muzzle loading shotgun and a musket?
 

Upvote 0
"Musket" is a military designation. Issued to troops, or militia, and usually with a bayonet fitting. Civilians used a fusil, firelock, gun - all mean the same thing. Sometimes "fowler", but that is the shooter not the gun.

Later (just before the Civil War era) they were rifled and called a "Rifled Musket".

Rifle, or rifled gun, would he the other firearm - more accurate and single projectile. Though a single round ball works great in muskets or smooth guns . . . out to 60 yards or a bit further.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top