Native Floridian
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 1,211
- Reaction score
- 486
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Ft Myers, Florida
- Detector(s) used
- Excal, Sov GT
- Primary Interest:
- Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
I am not surprised at all you see no issue with his comments. bo has repeatedly stated al Qaeda is decimated which they clearly are not.
I would vote for Herman Cane, Dr Ben Carlson or Alan West with no hesitation at all based on their opinions voiced to date and all 3 are not even half white.
My opposition to bo is his socialist politics, his numerious attacks on our rights, his handling or fumbling of his duties as POTUS, his constant lying, and his failure to uphold his oath of office.
We will NOT go quitely into the night!
So your problem is with the word decimate? Which you take to mean completely destroyed?
The Japanese were decimated by the end of 1943, yet they fought on for almost two more years. We can go on with examples of this but it is pointless. By your own words, in the post above, the Obama administration is clearly pursuing Al Qaeda. That we have the knowledge to publish the facts that you posted about Al Qaeda shows this to be the case. Yet, while the president actively pursues AL Qaeda you call him a liar.
Honestly, TH, i don't get it. There is no issue here. Decimate does not mean completely destroyed as tens of thousands of our World War two vets can testify. IMO, obama is doing his job.
And on that note with regard to benghazi - It was a tragedy for the families of those who were killed. But, in a war, if in fact it was Al Qaeda that attacked the embassy, we are not going to win them all. There are going to be loses. There are going to be government eff ups. We are a target. We aren't going to get it right every time. That has been our past and will be our future. Why do you hold this president to a higher standard than those who came before him?