Goodyguy
Gold Member
- Mar 10, 2007
- 6,489
- 6,903
- Detector(s) used
- Whites TM 808, Whites GMT, Tesoro Lobo Super Traq, Fisher Gold Bug 2, Suction Dredges, Trommels, Gold Vacs, High Bankers, Fluid bed Gold Traps, Rock Crushers, Sluices, Dry Washers, Miller Tables, Rp4
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
What GG said goes for me too. If the tails coming out of my Prospector shows a line of black sand, I take the three minutes to pull it for a clean out.
The Supermini on the other hand seems to have a trap that behaves quite differently. It gets a stationary gravel bed which the gold drops thru (the bed is very, very loose due to the water from the tubes). The other odd part is that it ejects almost all of the black sand almost from the beginning...usually without losing any gold, although once when I set it up on an aggressive slant and dropped some larger rocks on it (unwelcome vibration?) I lost my -50 and smaller gold - lesson learned!
I would love some manufacturer/expert commentary on that Supermini experience since it does seem quite different than the larger model. Comments?
Smaller trap is the reason.
In other words the water pressure from the tubes has less work to do. Because there is less area in the trap and also above the tubes it minimizes the chance for the weight of the black sand to overwhelm the flow from the tubes thus allowing for a more efficient fluidization of the denser material. Of course the smaller trap area is naturally going to be more sensitive to jolts (slosh factor) and too steep of an angle.
GG~
Last edited: