$1,325.oo in Gold Coins... It's Finders Keepers in Indiana

jeff of pa

Super Moderator
Staff member
Dec 19, 2003
88,056
62,369
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
000fff.jpg
000aaa.jpg
000bbb.jpg
000ccc.jpg
000ddd.jpg
000eee.jpg
 

Someone write this down! Sounds like case law and precedence has been set!
 

Yes I've seen allot of People here Claim If you Detect someones Property,
What ever cache you Find belongs
to the Land Owner.

from several News Articles I've seen, Not So.
First The Land Owner needs to Prove a Chain of Ownership within the Family.

Or it belongs to the Finder.

etiquette may say different, But apparently the Law rules
 

Last edited:
Lucky Kid I dont think I would want someone searching my land for that reason. All though I dont have any land to search lol
 

Great story, thanks for sharing..
 

Wonder what the attorney costs were?
 

probably 1/3 before Taxes

although that was 1920 lawyers may not have been as
greedy back then

I Hope the Kid didn't loose his share to Roosevelt's,
Presidential Gold Theft of 1933
 

Last edited:
Yes I've seen allot of People here Claim If you Detect someones Property,
What ever cache you Find belongs
to the Land Owner.

from several News Articles I've seen, Not So.
First The Land Owner needs to Prove a Chain of Ownership within the Family.

Or it belongs to the Finder.

etiquette may say different, But apparently the Law rules

Wow, that's crazy. Good to know! I wonder if the fact that this kid was employed on the property makes any difference?

For instance, I wonder if you found something if the owner of the property could tell the court, "I have no idea who this person is. They showed up on my property and started digging. Thankfully I caught them in the act trying to sneak things off my property." or some other such nonsense...

I guess that's why it's a good idea to get a permission in writing (text or email) if possible. Helps clear up issues if any should ever arise.
 

Wow, that's crazy. Good to know! I wonder if the fact that this kid was employed on the property makes any difference?

For instance, I wonder if you found something if the owner of the property could tell the court, "I have no idea who this person is. They showed up on my property and started digging. Thankfully I caught them in the act trying to sneak things off my property." or some other such nonsense...

I guess that's why it's a good idea to get a permission in writing (text or email) if possible. Helps clear up issues if any should ever arise.

Those Teens who were Digging a Hut on an Empty lot Got part of a Cache.
I Think I posted that One.

One thing for Sure, this one was Smart enough Not to turn it over to anyone,
Other then The Police when they arrived. Keeping the chain of custody Between the Ground & Him.
The only issues I've seen so far is where workers hide the find from the landowner
& Then the Landowner Claims ownership & Theft.

A handshake is a Contract, as far as That goes.
But I'd say If it's obviously Old Call the Police immediately when found.
If fairly recent either tell the Landowner,
Or ask the Landowner If he Can describe a Cache that may be found,
Before Calling police.

Of course Calling the Police can have Bad effects too.
It means Calling Lawyers :( Then the News, The Greedy Public & So does the IRS
Find Out.

May as well Re-Bury it
 

Last edited:
Personally I'd Never Sign a Contract given to me by a Stranger.
I'd just say No ! out of fear there is a ulterior Motive.

I've always gone be Gentlemens Agreements & A handshake myself
 

Last edited:

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top