- Aug 19, 2014
- 38,231
- 138,768
- Detector(s) used
- JW 8X-ML X2-VP 585
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hello Sdcfia
Not my fish to fry personally. I just provided some more ingredients to add. For some one else to see what they can cook up?
I am merely enjoying the sweet aroma of a treasure legend like a true consouier amigo.
Crow
Hello sdcfia Those coins would be a great desert indeed .....But like great feasts amigo there is always the bill that is fly in the ointment.
And the bill for me is I have an issue with Dutch Shultz treasure story? I have not been able to confirm the origins of when the story first got out about the story that the chest was hidden in the Catskills?
From what I can gather, It appears to have originated from a treasure writer in 1968 who first inserted a sentence in Dutch’s morphine-addled delirium at the hospital after he was shot. The sentence added was something like: “Hey, Lulu, let’s go up to Phoenicia and dig up the loot.” As you can see in my previous post that sentence was never in the original transcript.
F.J. Lang was the court stenographer at Schultz’s bedside after he was shot in October. Lang’s transcript was published in the New York Times at the time in 1935. That sentence that has fueled documentaries and spawned an “Unsolved Mystery” episode does not appear in the transcript.
Nor does it appear in the excellent book kill the Dutchman that was written by the late Paul Sann, Executive Director of the Daily News. While there is evidence that Schultz and his colleagues were in Phoenicia a couple years earlier in 1933. The story of him burying a chest is sadly is only speculation.
In particular, the treasure writer, Schurmacher, mistakenly described a scene from the Hotel Stratfield in Bridgeport, where Dutch reportedly loaded the chest in front of seven witnesses, as occurring in 1933 rather than 1935. If you come across a treasure theory that includes someone’s claimed psychic vision after seeing an episode of “Unsolved Mysteries” — rather than corroborated historical evidence.
So you can safely leave your shovel at home amigos.
However its not beyond the realms of impossibility that Dutch Shultz had money stashed somewhere? Maybe in a bank account under a false name? He certainly would have the money and means to do it. A 1935 report on income from racketeering shows a huge income.
The problem is one we all face is book authors tend exaggerate things either intentionally or unintentionally that later gets "taken as fact". Especially for the author when the motive is to sell books is the treasure. ( I am not ashamed to say I fell for that many times over the years. I have no doubt many of you have fallen for them too?)
However I am still open to the possibility that he may have hid somewhere else? But the only course that might remotely give us a clue is in his personal documents that was recovered after his murder?
So this is why this fish does not quite feel alright on Old Crows Menu.
Cheers Crow