Amazing Victorian Glass Domed Bridle Rosette!

[Erik in NJ]

This item first struck me as very odd when I dug it as I'm not used to digging anything metal with glass attached to it. I thought it was some sort of fancy plug or stopper and dropped it in my finds pouch.

Upon cleaning it up at home, I see that the brass or copper had a nice patina indicating some age probably back to the late 1800s to possible early 1900s. I could see black behind the glass which I figured was simply damage from water. As I sat back and looked at the item I almost fell over when I realized that the "damage" was actually a silvered Gothic-style letter "V" on a black background. But why on Earth would a stopper be monogrammed on the side that you would not see? The metal part with the "handle" appeared to have been gilded at some point, but the gilt is mostly worn off. I showed a photo to our resident relic guru--kuger, who immediately realized that this "plug/stopper" was indeed a glass domed bridle rosette! WOW! I have dug some beautiful rosettes before, but this is my first glass domed rosette and having the initial "V" gives me an opportunity to discover who may have owned it and when! The rosette is approx. 1-1/2" in diameter. Thanks again kuger for your sage identification!

N.B. Sorry for the duplicate post--the original title was too similar to my prior post as to cause confusion. I could not figure out how to delete or rename my new thread. Perhaps the moderators can help. Thanks.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A History of Mining on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska - Grab it through Amazon!

[BosnMate]

Very interesting find.

 

[Erik in NJ]

Very interesting find.

Thanks BM--it's not evident from the pics but there's a solid 1/4" flat glass dome mounted over the initial "V". It's quite an eye catching piece in person.

 

[WHADIFIND]

Now that is just one pretty find! I really like this! Maybe you can get a picture of the glass with a reflection, to show off that aspect.

Thanks for sharing.

HH!

 

[Tnmountains]

Just imagine how fancy that was in it's day. I doubt it was cheap especially with your initial in it. Cool find. Thanks for sharing.
HH
TnMtns

 

[Yard Digger]

Nice recovery!

 

[ticm]

That is a nice one. Never found one as fancy as that. Good find.

 

[steelheadwill]

Very Nice! I have a cracked glass one but with no manuscript. Congrats

 

[Rick (Nova Scotia)]

Cool find. I too have found a few but none of the glass type. I do recall seeing one posted in the last couple of years that was domed glass, and had a picture of a horses' head on it. That being the only other (that I noticed) I think is a scarce find indeed.

As far as the title, I sure do like when the title of a post reflects the finds. Generic titles like "saturdays finds" or "back to the park" I rarely click on.

 

[granthansen]

Great save! It'll make a great display piece for you. Amazing job by kuger on the ID.

 

[StormSurge]

Horse tack is utilitarian items that everyone would have owned or at least used before the early 20th century.Only a family "of means" would be able to afford to embellish their tack with personalized rosettes.
It would be cool if you can find who that monogram belonged to.
Nice find. Very interesting!

 

[Erik in NJ]

Hi StormSurge,

This item is definitely a "status symbol" and I agree with you that it came from a family of means. I will be contacting the property owner with some photos to see if she might know who it may have belonged to. This house was owned at one time by a very prominent family from the area, but the initial doesn't match theirs. I did however find a beautifully hand engraved coin silver spoon back in the summer on another property with three initials and the last initial of the monogram does match this family name. These types of finds that can be linked back to a specific family are by far my favorite. Thanks for your post and kind words!

Horse tack is utilitarian items that everyone would have owned or at least used before the early 20th century.Only a family "of means" would be able to afford to embellish their tack with personalized rosettes.
It would be cool if you can find who that monogram belonged to.
Nice find. Very interesting!

 

[Erik in NJ]

Here is an additional photo of the front of the rosette (the scanner really enhances the scratches on the surface of the glass--it looks much better in person that in the scan) as well as a side view of the rosette so that you can see the thickness of the glass dome.

 

[Erik in NJ]

Hi Rick,

I have been able to only find a few on the Internet--with not much information pertaining to them or when they were in use. I also checked the UK Finds Database to no avail, but they might call them something different than we do. A member here recommended an excellent book on bridle rosettes which I purchased. I have not had a chance to look there yet. I may try contacting the author. It's a real shame that scarce and interesting relics don't make the banner unless they are CW, Roman, or gold coins. I agree, I have never seen this type of rosette posted before here or on other forums that I have frequented.

Regarding the original title of the post--yes it was supposed to be a play on words regarding my last post, but I realized that many would confuse it with a post they'd already seen. I tried to rename the thread, but I cannot figure out how to either rename a thread or delete it.

Cool find. I too have found a few but none of the glass type. I do recall seeing one posted in the last couple of years that was domed glass, and had a picture of a horses' head on it. That being the only other (that I noticed) I think is a scarce find indeed.

As far as the title, I sure do like when the title of a post reflects the finds. Generic titles like "saturdays finds" or "back to the park" I rarely click on.

 

[okerraine]

Very nice. I love the Victorian yards. I recover some of my coolest finds there.

 

[StormSurge]

Hi StormSurge,

This item is definitely a "status symbol" and I agree with you that it came from a family of means. I will be contacting the property owner with some photos to see if she might know who it may have belonged to. This house was owned at one time by a very prominent family from the area, but the initial doesn't match theirs. I did however find a beautifully hand engraved coin silver spoon back in the summer on another property with three initials and the last initial of the monogram does match this family name. These types of finds that can be linked back to a specific family are by far my favorite. Thanks for your post and kind words!

I couldn't agree with you more Erick! I've found some cool items and lots of junk. Either way researching to find out what it is and how it was used almost becomes a passion. OK, " a passion"! And the " linked back to a specific family are my favorite" is the Cherry on top!

 

[Rick (Nova Scotia)]

Hi Rick,

I have been able to only find a few on the Internet--with not much information pertaining to them or when they were in use. I also checked the UK Finds Database to no avail, but they might call them something different than we do. A member here recommended an excellent book on bridle rosettes which I purchased. I have not had a chance to look there yet. I may try contacting the author. It's a real shame that scarce and interesting relics don't make the banner unless they are CW, Roman, or gold coins. I agree, I have never seen this type of rosette posted before here or on other forums that I have frequented.

Regarding the original title of the post--yes it was supposed to be a play on words regarding my last post, but I realized that many would confuse it with a post they'd already seen. I tried to rename the thread, but I cannot figure out how to either rename a thread or delete it.

You can not rename a thread after a certain number of minutes, I don't remember how many, but it gets locked in the data base, as "title name" and then becomes searchable by that name. I sumize that changing the name would "break" the search mechanism ?

 

[Don in SJ]

I have seen several of the glass bridal rosettes posted on TNet over the years, I was trying to find a post where someone made a positive era ID on them but could not, but sort of remember them being more early 1900s. I found one years ago in a 20th century dump area, I cannot make out what was underneath, but always thought it was a horse's head for some reason.
Here is a link to a Best Finds post made where a few members showed their glass rosettes.
http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/my-best-finds/220740-post-your-glass-rosettes.html

Found another link on TNet with more info:
http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/what/129435-rosette.html

Also on the link above take a look at this link of someone who makes to this day, but there is a bit of history on them there, says Victorian to early 1900s, which is probably where I got my info from, sure miss PBK, former Moderator and great researcher!
http://www.bridlerosettes.com/bridlerosetteshome.html
Don

 

[Erik in NJ]

I have seen several of the glass bridal rosettes posted on TNet over the years, I was trying to find a post where someone made a positive era ID on them but could not, but sort of remember them being more early 1900s. I found one years ago in a 20th century dump area, I cannot make out what was underneath, but always thought it was a horse's head for some reason.
Here is a link to a Best Finds post made where a few members showed their glass rosettes.
http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/my-best-finds/220740-post-your-glass-rosettes.html

Don

Thanks for your post. Most that I have been able to find on the Internet seem to have pictures on them. I have seen very few that are monogrammed. I have a very good book on the history of rosettes that was recommended by a Tnet member--perhaps there's more definitive information there or maybe the author would be of some assistance. If you are able to come across any more information, please post it! Thanks!

 

[kuger]

well I commented on the other thread...Thanks,and I too,am wanting to narrow down a date......I am leaning to 1950's just from the sites I have dug that style(as said before...could be totally wrong there....)