Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
grasshopper said:here's some info i found:
The south imported as many items into their war effort, from cannon to cartridges, rifles to powder, bullets to belts. Among the plates imported from Britain were their classic "snake" belt buckle, referred to as such because of the "S"-shaped animal used as the loop connectors of the two belt loops. Some styles were indeed true "snakes," while others were snakes with duck-heads (like this one), and variants of multiple styles and types. The British military used them, as well as private British makers made them for retail. Then, within the South, there were local makers of these "snake" buckles to boot. A lot of "snakes" around! It is also very true that this British "snake" buckle style continued to be made and utilized throughout her majesty's empire/colonies for many decades after the war. Sadly, many "snake" buckles are being passed for "Civil War," though many were made long afterward. And with so many variations known to exist from the War, it is hard to determine whether a plate is "period" or not by the size or style alone. BUT, with the construction of the brazing of the "loops" that the "snake" hooks into, we KNOW this is STRICTLY CIVIL WAR PERIOD!!! Dug specimens are nice, since they tell you it was found within a camp or battle. But non-dug ones abound from many places. This one measures 45mm by 72mm--which is the size of the snake buckle in Mullinax's CS Belt Buckle book, Plate 206 (though a different style). What is nice is that regardless, they are an affordable option for collector's to exemplify one of the South's well-used plates.
http://www.championhillrelics.com/bucklesplates.htm
England did supply the south with a lot of things during the civil war, so that item could be one of the items supplied.CRUSADER said:I'm no expert either, I just hoped these were more studied over there than here. You are right there are many different designs, & some are still worn on Naval uniforms, so they are used until the present & back into the 16th C when they first appeared.MKnTenn said:I,m no expert but there are many different types of these and many are called Civil War that are not, but the design on this one matches the ones that have been found in confederate camps exactly. That is what I go by, the design, and size, but you are right about them used before and after the Civil War. HHCRUSADER said:MKnTenn said:Nice Civil War Snake buckle, I dug one just like it, but yours is in fantastic condition! Blows the coins away as to value. HH
Can anyone enlighten me as to why these are 'only' CW period? Bearing in mind I have found a few over here.
All I can guess, having seen many matches to the one found here in the UK, that these must have been manufactured here & shipped to the US. If someone has date information, please come forward? I would have placed it in the pre-CW period, but doesn't mean they were not using old fittings
Dig It Man said:England did supply the south with a lot of things during the civil war, so that item could be one of the items supplied.CRUSADER said:I'm no expert either, I just hoped these were more studied over there than here. You are right there are many different designs, & some are still worn on Naval uniforms, so they are used until the present & back into the 16th C when they first appeared.MKnTenn said:I,m no expert but there are many different types of these and many are called Civil War that are not, but the design on this one matches the ones that have been found in confederate camps exactly. That is what I go by, the design, and size, but you are right about them used before and after the Civil War. HHCRUSADER said:MKnTenn said:Nice Civil War Snake buckle, I dug one just like it, but yours is in fantastic condition! Blows the coins away as to value. HH
Can anyone enlighten me as to why these are 'only' CW period? Bearing in mind I have found a few over here.
All I can guess, having seen many matches to the one found here in the UK, that these must have been manufactured here & shipped to the US. If someone has date information, please come forward? I would have placed it in the pre-CW period, but doesn't mean they were not using old fittings
kuger said:Dig It Man said:England did supply the south with a lot of things during the civil war, so that item could be one of the items supplied.CRUSADER said:I'm no expert either, I just hoped these were more studied over there than here. You are right there are many different designs, & some are still worn on Naval uniforms, so they are used until the present & back into the 16th C when they first appeared.MKnTenn said:I,m no expert but there are many different types of these and many are called Civil War that are not, but the design on this one matches the ones that have been found in confederate camps exactly. That is what I go by, the design, and size, but you are right about them used before and after the Civil War. HHCRUSADER said:MKnTenn said:Nice Civil War Snake buckle, I dug one just like it, but yours is in fantastic condition! Blows the coins away as to value. HH
Can anyone enlighten me as to why these are 'only' CW period? Bearing in mind I have found a few over here.
All I can guess, having seen many matches to the one found here in the UK, that these must have been manufactured here & shipped to the US. If someone has date information, please come forward? I would have placed it in the pre-CW period, but doesn't mean they were not using old fittings
Is the C.W. the only significant period in our Nations history?Was there any C.W. activity in Montana?If the only examples of these buckles came during the C.W. how did the ones that come from sites that Pre Date the C.W. get here?Did the only Brits come to America during the C.W?
kuger said:There is a book out dedicated wholly to these buckles.I have not laid hands on it as of yet though.I have seen these come from Australia with various names on them as well"Victoria",Melbourne",that variety may be the Palatapus",type as well?
CRUSADER said:kuger said:There is a book out dedicated wholly to these buckles.I have not laid hands on it as of yet though.I have seen these come from Australia with various names on them as well"Victoria",Melbourne",that variety may be the Palatapus",type as well?
If you get the title, please share, I'm unaware of it, & I would get a copy.
kuger said:Just to hopin here guys.....there are over 27 different types of these buckles and many Pre Date the C.W.,and I can also tell you a whole lot of em made here to the U.S. long before the C.W. ........a whole bunch!!!!
What do you mean by sites that did not exist after 1860... where did they go?kuger said:Here are a couple from Pre C.W sites..............sites that did not exist after 1860......
abandoned,gone................one burned in 1858,and was never occupied againBroken knee said:What do you mean by sites that did not exist after 1860... where did they go?kuger said:Here are a couple from Pre C.W sites..............sites that did not exist after 1860......
Broken Knee
kuger said:abandoned,gone................one burned in 1858,and was never occupied againBroken knee said:What do you mean by sites that did not exist after 1860... where did they go?kuger said:Here are a couple from Pre C.W sites..............sites that did not exist after 1860......
Broken Knee