swund1703
Jr. Member
- Jun 22, 2013
- 47
- 9
Cxt machines was thought that crossed my mind the other day but just looking for your opinions of what is $1000 better than the etrac
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cxt machines was thought that crossed my mind the other day but just looking for your opinions of what is $1000 better than the etrac
Watet proof and more bells and whistles
There is waaaaay more than a couple differences between the CTX and E-Trac. For starters, FBS2 is a melding of all digital V-Flex technology with standard FBS. It has more digital technology than a regular E-trac.
It's waterproof to 10ft.
It has wireless capability.
It has "Target Trace", which is way cool!
It has a bigger faster processor than the E-Trac.
It has built in GPS.
It has updatable firmware capability through the "Exchange".
And even though it's a tad heavier, it balances better than the prior FBS units.
Is it worth another $1k more than an E-Trac? It's your choice.
Bottom line: faster response, auto sensitivity is way more stable, the GPS system, and IMHO the most impressive feature is the Combine mode, which is amazing to use in trashy areas to sniff out targets that other machines miss. Worth every cent!!
Have both the CTX and E-Trac and have tested them side-by-side and in the field. The CTX has a slight edge on depth, target separation, unmasking, and providing visual and audio information. The caveat is that the CTX isn't a "wow" factor upgrade, it isn't a major leap in technology, more of a tweak. You might get that fringe area target in and around iron that the E-Trac would null on at depth.
The CTX color screen is nice - but washed out and hard to see outdoors. Most hunt by audio clues anyway and glance at the screen to confirm. It would have been nice if the screen pivoted - turning it toward the user, but it doesn't.
The useful thing about CTX's combined mode is that the split bottom zone (bin) can be assigned a Low Tone audio without using DISC. This one feature allows the use of zero DISC in 4TF which helps improve target sensitivity and depth. So, that's a plus.
The majority of the weight of the CTX is behind the armrest and allows the stem to pivot at the grip- which is a natural balance point. That is, there is less felt weight even though the CTX is heavier than the E-Trac. The net effect: it is easier to manipulate and there is less torque on the arm - which is less tiring.
Both the CTX and E-Trac are low freq machines and are going to be silver sensitive - which if you are a coin hunter is a plus. They both have great TID at depth - though the CTX has a slight advantage there. The CTX may gain 1/2" to 1" more accurate TID depth over the E-Trac, depending on soil characteristics.
If you are going to buy an FBS machine - it would make sense to get a used CTX rather than a new E-Trac, both run about the same price. If you don't need the TID and just want to know if a target is non-ferrous or ferrous at depth, there are cheaper solutions.
I'm like that kid Ralphie on Christmas Story who has been lusting after a Red Ryder BB gun for a LONG time. Obviously it's a matter of having the dollars to buy one...but all of the bells and whistles on that machine match most of what I've been looking for in a detector.
You'll detect your eye out!