jharhed
Hero Member
- Jan 5, 2008
- 780
- 133
- Detector(s) used
- DFX, MX5, M6, Garrett Pro Pointer AT
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Would the sizing feature and number category on the qxt give it the advantage in finding rings over the xlt??
XLT vs QXT in finding rings
- Thread starter jharhed
- Start date
Sandman
Gold Member
- Aug 6, 2005
- 13,398
- 3,993
- Detector(s) used
- Excal 1000, Excal II, Sovereign GT, CZ-20, Tiger Shark, Tejon, GTI 1500, Surfmaster Pulse, CZ6a, DFX, AT PRO, Fisher 1235, Surf PI Pro, 1280-X, many more because I enjoy learning them. New Garrett Ca
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Not really.........It would help to recover more targets in the pull tab range so keep disc low.
U.K. Brian
Bronze Member
- Oct 11, 2005
- 1,629
- 153
- Detector(s) used
- XLT, Whites D.F., Treasure Baron, Deepstar, Goldquest, Beachscan, T.D.I., Sovereign, 2x Nautilus, various Arado's, Ixcus Diver, Altek Quadtone, T2, Beach Hunter I.D, GS 5 pulse, Searchman 2 ,V3i
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
No and if your trying to choose between the two do check the QXT will work in your part of the country. For some reason in Britain the QXT worked really well but in other areas didn't and people thought they had bought a lemon. The XLT on the other hand work well anywhere.
I guess this is why we didn't get the Pro version when it came out.
I guess this is why we didn't get the Pro version when it came out.
Top Member Reactions
-
3669 -
1994 -
1864 -
1495 -
1253 -
1093 -
1074 -
980 -
860 -
725 -
671 -
574 -
473 -
464 -
437 -
E
429
-
403 -
397 -
383 -
379
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest Discussions
-
Looking For Rain God's Gold, by Alfred Strong Lewis- Latest: Gregory E. Davis
-
-
-
