bilt46
Sr. Member
I Found this today on the surface very near chicago, it has some moss on it and i cleaned it a little... I would like some help to find out how old and what type of animal..Thanks bilt46..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your find appears to be an Equus horse upper molar. Could be Pleistocene, but could also be from ten years ago. I don't think the Chicago area was very habitable for most of the Pleistocene. Even after the Wisconsinan Ice Sheet retreated, the Chicago area was wet prairie until it was drained for farming.bilt46 said:I Found this today on the surface very near chicago, it has some moss on it and i cleaned it a little... I would like some help to find out how old and what type of animal..Thanks bilt46..
I don't know what that your observation means. Do you believe the tooth is too large or too small to be only ten years old??Exnihilo said:Because of the size of the tooth, I don't think it could be from ten years old. But I'm not a specialist
Too largeHarry Pristis said:I don't know what that your observation means. Do you believe the tooth is too large or too small to be only ten years old??Exnihilo said:Because of the size of the tooth, I don't think it could be from ten years old. But I'm not a specialist
Sooo... You think this tooth is too large to be recent. Do you imagine that horses have been getting smaller over time? ...That say Pleistocene horses were larger than modern horses? Modern horses come in all sizes, from Percherons to miniatures. Size of the tooth is a weak diagnostic character.Exnihilo said:Too largeHarry Pristis said:I don't know what that your observation means. Do you believe the tooth is too large or too small to be only ten years old??Exnihilo said:Because of the size of the tooth, I don't think it could be from ten years old. But I'm not a specialist
Look on the photo. The first one is from the Miocen, the second one is a molar teeth and the last one an other tooth. First, they doesn't have the same size. Moreover if you look the first photo of Bilt46, you will notice they have the same form.Harry Pristis said:Sooo... You think this tooth is too large to be recent. Do you imagine that horses have been getting smaller over time? ...That say Pleistocene horses were larger than modern horses? Modern horses come in all sizes, from Percherons to miniatures. Size of the tooth is a weak diagnostic character.Exnihilo said:Too largeHarry Pristis said:I don't know what that your observation means. Do you believe the tooth is too large or too small to be only ten years old??Exnihilo said:Because of the size of the tooth, I don't think it could be from ten years old. But I'm not a specialist
And I wondering if you're not getting at me.Harry Pristis said:I can see now that you are fond of weak diagnostics.