markmar
Silver Member
- Oct 17, 2012
- 4,258
- 6,468
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
A quick question:
I lived in Mexico City for about a year. (That's not a question)
I still spend a lot of time in Manzanillo each year, as I found my wife there.....(Thats not a question either)
Here's the question: The stone work made by the Aztecs in Mexico, that which survives, looks way more "advanced" than this head. This was my wife's first observation when I mentioned "Aztec" in reference to the head. She chuckled, said "no way, this does not look Aztec," and you know, I have to agree with her.
How would you explain the difference in the stone work the Aztecs definitely made, with this "lower quality craftsmanship" head in the Sups that they allegedly made?
And.....if the head is Aztec, how would you explain the change in sculpting style/quality between here and there? Meaning....who along the way helped them "get better" at stonework in the time between this head was made and their temples built in the middle of a giant lake in Tenochtitlan?
There are serious questions. Im not belittling your opinion. Im actually curious about your perspective.
I got your question. There is a big difference between a skilled stoneworker who was trained to do carvings and statues on temples, and a common warrior or a head priest who were engaged to transport and to hide few bodies and some valuable stuff. They didn't need a craftman in regards to make a simple marker. They didn't want a piece of art which would reveal their presence and origin, but something simple and symbolic.
They wanted their motherland to remain secret and for that reason choose an European-Middle East carving style for that face. That corner shape at the eye is more used in Egyptian paintings and carvings. The face it's not only related to their motherland, but also reveals the Aztec origin which was primarily a mix of Europeans-Middle Easterns and Toltecs.
Last edited: