What Scott Pinsker ( WISHES ) the NRA would say in a speech ......

XLTer

Hero Member
Sep 26, 2012
634
303
Western Pa.
Detector(s) used
Whites XLT
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Editor's note: Author Scott Pinsker is a marketing and publicity expert who writes occasionally for Fox News Opinion. This is his vision of a speech he would like to see delivered by leaders at the National Rifle Association. It has not been delivered by the NRA.




Greetings. My name is Wayne LaPierre, and I’m the executive vice president of the National Rifle Association. After the national tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School, it was my hope that Red America and Blue America would finally come together and try to solve a serious problem, because protecting our children from violent madmen isn’t a conservative position or a liberal position; it’s a common-sense position.

Sadly, instead of offering new solutions, the same anti-gun zealots who’ve always hated the Second Amendment have politicized the deaths of kindergartners, adopting the Rahm Emanuel tactic of “Never letting a good crisis go to waste.” Anti-gun newspapers have even published the names and private addresses of law-abiding gun-owners – something they would NEVER do to sex offenders, drug addicts, wife-beaters, AIDS victims, welfare recipients or women who’ve had an abortion – and rightly so.




The Sandy Hook tragedy, the Virginia Tech shooting, the Aurora “Batman” shooting, the Tucson shooting – all of the killers were mentally unstable young men who were prescribed mind-altering psychiatric drugs.


The NRA tried to help: Since we protect our president, vice president, governors, senators, judges, banks, hospitals, office buildings and jewelry stores with armed guards, why does it make sense to protect our schoolchildren with a small sign that says, “This Is a Gun Free Zone” – and then hope that someone with a gun can get there quickly if there’s an emergency? Why do we have armed guards at middle school and high school football games – but not at the actual middle schools or high schools?

But this still doesn’t do enough to protect our children. The time for partisanship is over; now is the time for action. And that’s why the NRA is requesting the assistance of the ACLU.

The Sandy Hook tragedy, the Virginia Tech shooting, the Aurora “Batman” shooting, the Tucson shooting – all of the killers had something in common: They were all mentally unstable young men who were prescribed mind-altering psychiatric drugs.

These killers didn’t purchase their guns illegally, or watch Fox News, or circumvent background checks by attending gun shows. They didn’t have prior convictions or troubling police records. That’s not the common denominator. The common denominator is that these young men were sick – and everyone knew it.

The ACLU has done more than any other organization to protect the legal rights of mentally sick people.

This is a fact.

Because of the ACLU, mentally sick people can refuse medical treatment or psychiatric care, even when their mental condition has left them homeless and penniless. Even in situations like Adam Lanza, the 20-year-old Sandy Hook killer, whose own mother, according to reports, was unable to mandate medical treatment for her son.

The NRA doesn’t hate the mentally ill. They deserve our compassion and our help. But sick young men have spilled far too much innocent blood. This simply cannot continue.

The NRA is hereby inviting the ACLU to join us on a study to find common-sense solutions that will prevent violent madmen from harming our children. And then together, it’s our hope that the NRA and the ACLU will offer these solutions directly to President Obama.

This won’t be easy. It’s anathema to the NRA to deny any law-abiding American the right to bear arms, just as it’s anathema to the ACLU to deny any American the same civil liberties of his neighbors. But despite our personal biases, there must be a solution that’s better than the status quo!

An inspirational politician once declared that there isn’t a Red America and a Blue America, or a black America and a white America – there’s the United States of America. As Americans, let’s come together, rise above the rhetoric, and actually do something that protects our children.

Thank you.


Read more: The five minute NRA speech that would change the gun control debate forever | Fox News
 

Fantastic. Now it someone would from the NRA would just say it. Unfortunately, they act like they've had their man parts put in a lock box by the anti-gun folks.

Time to stand up --- erect --- and go on the offensive looking for a way to solve these problems WITHOUT allowing the destruction of our founding documents.
 

Fantastic. Now it someone would from the NRA would just say it. Unfortunately, they act like they've had their man parts put in a lock box by the anti-gun folks.

Time to stand up --- erect --- and go on the offensive looking for a way to solve these problems WITHOUT allowing the destruction of our founding documents.

Yes, Freud WOULD say guns ARE metaphors for that... MY BANG IS BIGGER THAN YOUR BANG! ROFL...
 

Last edited:
At least he waited till the second paragraph to make a racist generalization of the people who are anti-gun. I had no idea that all of the anti-gun people were of Jewish decent?

ZEALOTS (Hebrew, Ḳanna'im)
Zealous defenders of the Law and of the national life of the Jewish people; name of a party opposing with relentless rigor any attempt to bring Judea under the dominion of idolatrous Rome, and especially of the aggressive and fanatical war party from the time of Herod until the fall of Jerusalem and Masada. The members of this party bore also the name Sicarii, from their custom of going about with daggers ("sicæ") hidden beneath their cloaks, with which they would stab any one found committing a sacrilegious act or anything provoking anti-Jewish feeling.
 

At least he waited till the second paragraph to make a racist generalization of the people who are anti-gun. I had no idea that all of the anti-gun people were of Jewish decent?

ZEALOTS (Hebrew, Ḳanna'im)
Zealous defenders of the Law and of the national life of the Jewish people; name of a party opposing with relentless rigor any attempt to bring Judea under the dominion of idolatrous Rome, and especially of the aggressive and fanatical war party from the time of Herod until the fall of Jerusalem and Masada. The members of this party bore also the name Sicarii, from their custom of going about with daggers ("sicæ") hidden beneath their cloaks, with which they would stab any one found committing a sacrilegious act or anything provoking anti-Jewish feeling.

Great statement coming from the land of the "residential school system". How many First Nations children did your "teachers" and "administrators" kill?

Please choose your words more carefully.

Zealot is not exclusive to the Jews. It may be a Hebrew word, but it has been used by people of all nations to refer to those who are pursuing causes "at all costs". It can be used to describe some who are anti-gun as well as some who are pro-gun.

It is only a racist statement in the eyes of a racist.
 

Thanks for bringing up the residential school system and calling me a racist. My "teachers" and "administrators"? The only reason for you to bring up the residential school system is a personal attack against me and the Country I choose to live in. I was just trying to relay that the dude who wrote the speech should "choose" his words more carefully. Now take your time, re-read what I posted and think to yourself as to what it says. Once again, thanks for referring to me as a racist it is much appreciated as always.

Your red skinned Cousin up north,

BackBacon (aka BackStrap)
 

Thanks for bringing up the residential school system and calling me a racist. My "teachers" and "administrators"? The only reason for you to bring up the residential school system is a personal attack against me and the Country I choose to live in. I was just trying to relay that the dude who wrote the speech should "choose" his words more carefully. Now take your time, re-read what I posted and think to yourself as to what it says. Once again, thanks for referring to me as a racist it is much appreciated as always.

Your red skinned Cousin up north,

BackBacon (aka BackStrap)

Well, if you hadn't brought up racism, then no racism would have been spoken of. Here are YOUR WORDS:

At least he waited till the second paragraph to make a racist generalization of the people who are anti-gun. I had no idea that all of the anti-gun people were of Jewish decent?

ZEALOTS (Hebrew, Ḳanna'im)
Zealous defenders of the Law and of the national life of the Jewish people; name of a party opposing with relentless rigor any attempt to bring Judea under the dominion of idolatrous Rome, and especially of the aggressive and fanatical war party from the time of Herod until the fall of Jerusalem and Masada. The members of this party bore also the name Sicarii, from their custom of going about with daggers ("sicæ") hidden beneath their cloaks, with which they would stab any one found committing a sacrilegious act or anything provoking anti-Jewish feeling.

Your misunderstanding of what was said (or to be more accurate your TWISTING of what was said) in order to discredit something is where the racist talk began. If a Canadian wants to call someone else racist, they need to first acknowledge their mistakes. Next they need to apply it in THEIR home.

If you are my red skinned cousin up north, then fix your problems. We have our own.
 

Why the hell would you even begin to think that I speak for the entire country of Canada? The Canadian Government has already made a formal apology regarding the residential school system that has been accepted by the governing body of Chiefs. Monetary reparations are currently being paid to the survivors and their respective families. My entire family from Ontario was effected by the residential school system and "we" and the rest of the country are getting on with life.
 

Why the hell would you even begin to think that I speak for the entire country of Canada? The Canadian Government has already made a formal apology regarding the residential school system that has been accepted by the governing body of Chiefs. Monetary reparations are currently being paid to the survivors and their respective families. My entire family from Ontario was effected by the residential school system and "we" and the rest of the country are getting on with life.


You have my sympathies if you were negatively affected.

So, when did Canada come to be under U.S. Law? You want to discuss and condemn U.S. law, therefore, you must assume you are under it - so when did this happen?
 

I have citizenship in both countries and have stated so in previous threads. I voted for Obama during his first campaign and did not have a chance to cast a ballot in the previous election. I cross the border frequently to visit friends and relatives that reside in the US and am under US law when doing so.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top