Just a side note.
I think the pics were deceiving folks a bit. If it were laying flat, and not pictured at an obtuse angle, I believe it would appear as being two sided with a flat break across the bottom
If that is a flat break across the bottom, it's appearing as a "third face" in the pics.
Arrowheads, dart points, knives, spear points are usually referred to as "biface" ... that is they have TWO faces.
When they break, they will generally have a flat, smooth surface across the break.
I think this is what you are seeing, in person, but it's not coming through in the pics. (now seeing only a single pic, after the edit)
A common complaint I have , sorry, but it needs to be said.
When someone only shows a single side and wants help ... especially when they show multiple pictures of only one side ... I cringe, inside.
Biface ... two sides ... need pics of both sides.
It's like showing multiple pics of a horse's belly and never showing the top side, and asking what kind of horse is this.
TWO SIDES on a biface.
That said, this does have the classic appearance of a bifacial quartz point that has been broken.
If found in a cluster of other artifacts, then it probably is.
The problem with quartz points from this region is the chip-scars do not show up well, ... very hard to see in pictures and requires close scrutiny in person. Much easier with flint, for example.
If you can examine the outer edges of this biface, and see tiny chip scars, (they should be there if this is a chipped artifact) that would be conclusive.
Another important trait to look for ... Bifaces will most often have a central ridge (not always, some are quite flat) running down the middle of each face. This gives the "break" a diamond shape, in cross section.
This shows a prominent central ridge running down the side that is pictured, but the cross section is not diamond shaped.
So, the immediate observation is "the answer may lie on the other side". And we can't see it.
Is there a central ridge on the other side ?
All that said, there is an additional problem ... you only have the tip.
Bifacial points were made in your area for some 14,000 years.
No one can tell you the length of this point, no one can tell you what the base of this point looked like.
It's far easier to classify a point if you find the broken base ... generally impossible by looking at a tip.
All this long winded stuff, ... sorry.
I do think this has the general appearance of an artifact tip ... but would never attempt to classify it because I know how hard it is to do from a pic, ... especially if we are dealing with quartz, not seeing a base, and only see one side.
If this shows minor chip scars upon close examination, the best you can deduce is that it is a tip of something.
There is also a big possibility it was broken during manufacturing a biface, is simply the discarded piece, and never was used as a tool.
I apologize for the long answer. (I've been making hundreds of points a year for 25 years and teach classes on this subject.)