U
umrgolf
Guest
- #1
Thread Owner
This one was dug in a field that produced 17th, 18th, and 19th century coins.. this piece looks very old and is broken off at the end..
romeo-1 said:Broken pipe tamper?
plehbah said:umrgolf2000 said:romeo-1 said:Broken pipe tamper?
Nope, no holes in it.. I knew this would throw people for a loop, the day I dug this, an archie walked over and asked us what we were finding.. I guess he lived across the street and obviously we didn't show him anything too great. Everything I showed him he nailed the i.d. instantly except for this one.. He said 'wow, this looks like the oldest thing youve got, but i have no clue what it is' haha.. the unsolved relic![]()
If the archaeologist came across and was friendly and naturally curious as to what you are finding, I think it would have been worth taking a chance to give him or her the benefit of the doubt.
Losing a couple of coppers is worth running into a friendly archaeologist, and allowing them to get excited by your finds and to give your their opinions on the site and materials.
I know the press is bad, but I am bringing two of my buddies digging with me this weekend in the spot where I think the local club will also be hunting, and there will be three archaeologists at a club hunt. i already brought one, and she had a great time digging for targets and looking for murky dimes.
Try to help me change the times. I am not yelling at you. I have actually written you into my will.
Muddyhandz said:I was going to say a whistle but there are no holes. It could be some sort of finial.
The church had to fund the Archaeological digs?It must have been a private contract at the request of the church otherwise why should they have to pay? Interesting.
Good luck on the I.D.
Dave.
Muddyhandz said:I was going to say a whistle but there are no holes. It could be some sort of finial.
The church had to fund the Archaeological digs?It must have been a private contract at the request of the church otherwise why should they have to pay? Interesting.
Good luck on the I.D.
Dave.
plehbah said:Muddyhandz said:I was going to say a whistle but there are no holes. It could be some sort of finial.
The church had to fund the Archaeological digs?It must have been a private contract at the request of the church otherwise why should they have to pay? Interesting.
Good luck on the I.D.
Dave.
The church might have been a designated landmark, or on the National Register of Historic Places, or something like that. To be required to have an archaeological dig before any sort of renovation means that they were receiving Federal funds of some kind.
Now, back to identifying this mysterious find!
umrgolf2000 said:plehbah said:Muddyhandz said:I was going to say a whistle but there are no holes. It could be some sort of finial.
The church had to fund the Archaeological digs?It must have been a private contract at the request of the church otherwise why should they have to pay? Interesting.
Good luck on the I.D.
Dave.
The church might have been a designated landmark, or on the National Register of Historic Places, or something like that. To be required to have an archaeological dig before any sort of renovation means that they were receiving Federal funds of some kind.
Now, back to identifying this mysterious find!
I think you are right about both.. First, the church is a historical landmark or at least I would think so, it has one of those historic markers by the road. Second, they had a new building that looked less than a year or two old and another building that was maybe 8 or 10 years old. I know nothing about the laws but it seems like this is the plausible explanation as to why the pastor told me that.. back to the relic, its only broken on the bottom end that breezie calls the neck sleeveif anyone would like a different angle or something let me know
Good thread. I think it has similarities.Felinepeachy said:Does this look similar to yours?