Wyomingmedic
Sr. Member
- Jan 31, 2013
- 298
- 163
- Detector(s) used
- Truffle seeking pig modified for metal.
The results have been so-so
When the pig fails me (which is often), I am relegated to a CTX3030 *sigh*. Like the dark ages or something.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
I was able to hit a local park for the first time with my new CTX. I found a plethora of pop tabs and chain link fence scraps.
I am noticing what I can only describe as "falsing". Basically, it is a decent sounding signal which is only repeatable when the coil is swung a certain way. If I change my stance or swing angle, the signal will sound like garbage and I will move on.
That said, I did have some issues with seemed like strong, repeatable signals which would solidly register at all swing angles. Once I started digging, it was like the signal moved. I could scan and pinpoint with the CTX, dig the area, randomly scan the hole getting the same position I was before. After a few minutes of digging, I would scan the hole and notice that the target is now stronger several inches to either side. I'm sure the target was not in the dirt I dug.
I wonder if it is the remnants of gum wrappers and other foil (which seemed to be everywhere) or possibly the ground itself. Running through the ground balance procedure seemed to help a bit, but once I moved a few feet, it was back again.
New to the detector, so I am not expecting to just pick it up and run circles with it. I am very shocked at the amount of signals that my brain must decipher quickly. Having become proficient at morse code, I don't think I will have a problem with it. But the idea that a signal could move seems to boggle the mind.
Thoughts on my approach? Is "falsing" a common problem while learning higher end machines?
Thanks,
WM
I am noticing what I can only describe as "falsing". Basically, it is a decent sounding signal which is only repeatable when the coil is swung a certain way. If I change my stance or swing angle, the signal will sound like garbage and I will move on.
That said, I did have some issues with seemed like strong, repeatable signals which would solidly register at all swing angles. Once I started digging, it was like the signal moved. I could scan and pinpoint with the CTX, dig the area, randomly scan the hole getting the same position I was before. After a few minutes of digging, I would scan the hole and notice that the target is now stronger several inches to either side. I'm sure the target was not in the dirt I dug.
I wonder if it is the remnants of gum wrappers and other foil (which seemed to be everywhere) or possibly the ground itself. Running through the ground balance procedure seemed to help a bit, but once I moved a few feet, it was back again.
New to the detector, so I am not expecting to just pick it up and run circles with it. I am very shocked at the amount of signals that my brain must decipher quickly. Having become proficient at morse code, I don't think I will have a problem with it. But the idea that a signal could move seems to boggle the mind.
Thoughts on my approach? Is "falsing" a common problem while learning higher end machines?
Thanks,
WM