Vermont Senator Withdraws Gun Bill

Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
12,824
Reaction score
7,901
Golden Thread
0
Location
New Hampshire
Detector(s) used
Garret Master hunter Cx Plus
Primary Interest:
Other
Vermont Senator Withdraws Gun Bill

Posted: Jan 21, 2013 11:52 AM EST Updated: Jan 21, 2013 12:02 PM EST
By Lesley Engle

MONTPELIER, Vt. -

Just a week shy of being introduced, Vermont's senate majority leader is withdrawing a bill that would have banned semi-automatic guns.

In a statement, Vt. Sen. Philip Baruth, a Chittenden County Democrat, said he decided to withdraw the legislation because it became very clear that it had little support in Montpelier.

Fox44 spoke to Sen. Baruth Monday morning and he declined an on-camera interview, but gave the following statement:

After much thought, I've decided to withdraw S32, a proposed ban on assault weapons. It was a difficult decision, and one I fear will disappoint those who have written expressing their support. I began thinking about the bill after the Gabby Giffords shootings in Arizona, thought more seriously about it following Aurora, and had it finally drafted in the wake of Sandy Hook. It seemed to me that with the Federal government paralyzed, it had been left to the states to address both the mental health and gun-related components of these tragedies.

But it is painfully clear to me now that little support exists in the Vermont Statehouse for this sort of bill. It's equally clear that focusing the debate on the banning of a certain class of weapons may already be overshadowing measures with greater consensus, like tightening background checks, stopping the exchange of guns for drugs, and closing gun show loopholes. Finally, as incoming Majority Leader, I owe it to my caucus to remove an issue that seems increasingly likely to complicate our shared agenda this biennium.

To the many responsible gun-owners with whom I've communicated over the last several weeks: I've heard you. Please hear me when I say that government is not your enemy — we are all alike threatened by the kind of violence we saw in Newtown, violence that is clearly spreading. And all of us are responsible for stopping it. It's my hope that with this ban set aside, you'll join more willingly in that effort.
 

Sounds like he at least is listening to his voters......only reason he smartened up.
 

Sounds like he at least is listening to his voters......only reason he smartened up.
Yup...he smartened-up......because, for most politicians, out of office means "back to the car wash"...LOL
Jim
 

Red James cash said:
Vermont Senator Withdraws Gun Bill

Posted: Jan 21, 2013 11:52 AM EST Updated: Jan 21, 2013 12:02 PM EST
By Lesley Engle

MONTPELIER, Vt. -

Just a week shy of being introduced, Vermont's senate majority leader is withdrawing a bill that would have banned semi-automatic guns.

In a statement, Vt. Sen. Philip Baruth, a Chittenden County Democrat, said he decided to withdraw the legislation because it became very clear that it had little support in Montpelier.

Fox44 spoke to Sen. Baruth Monday morning and he declined an on-camera interview, but gave the following statement:

After much thought, I've decided to withdraw S32, a proposed ban on assault weapons. It was a difficult decision, and one I fear will disappoint those who have written expressing their support. I began thinking about the bill after the Gabby Giffords shootings in Arizona, thought more seriously about it following Aurora, and had it finally drafted in the wake of Sandy Hook. It seemed to me that with the Federal government paralyzed, it had been left to the states to address both the mental health and gun-related components of these tragedies.

But it is painfully clear to me now that little support exists in the Vermont Statehouse for this sort of bill. It's equally clear that focusing the debate on the banning of a certain class of weapons may already be overshadowing measures with greater consensus, like tightening background checks, stopping the exchange of guns for drugs, and closing gun show loopholes. Finally, as incoming Majority Leader, I owe it to my caucus to remove an issue that seems increasingly likely to complicate our shared agenda this biennium.

To the many responsible gun-owners with whom I've communicated over the last several weeks: I've heard you. Please hear me when I say that government is not your enemy — we are all alike threatened by the kind of violence we saw in Newtown, violence that is clearly spreading. And all of us are responsible for stopping it. It's my hope that with this ban set aside, you'll join more willingly in that effort.

Democracy at work. Big bad government listening to its people.
 

Now, watch he will back door this thing somehow. Like tie it to another bill. Worth watching!
 

You mean hide it in a 1000 page bill that has nothing to do with gun control, surely politicians would never do that.....
 

Yeah, your right. They don't have any history like that........like healthcare.
 

Gun control is one thing that Vt. legislatures know they can't get passed. Even with our far left Gov., he is also a gun owner and has stated that he won't sign any gun bills, of course this will still have to be seen. Politians will be what they are.
 

Our system at government can work!! People can file all the wacky bills they want to try and make a point. First they need to get passed, then they need to withstand any legal challenges. This is the checks and balance system that our founding fathers created.
 

Our system at government can work!! People can file all the wacky bills they want to try and make a point. First they need to get passed, then they need to withstand any legal challenges. This is the checks and balance system that our founding fathers created.

Say that to our KING and how many Executive orders....or just pushing something through on xmas or new years when was it again..NDAA..not many checks and balances on those days..lol Dont forget the internet bill he wouldn't let congress even read...lol
 

Our system at government can work!! People can file all the wacky bills they want to try and make a point. First they need to get passed, then they need to withstand any legal challenges. This is the checks and balance system that our founding fathers created.
Oh, you mean like how they bribed Ben Nelson? The Cornhusker Kickback.....
ben-nelson-sell-out_c3bc7_0.jpg
 

And it didnt even take a mass armed uprising!!
 

And it didnt even take a mass armed uprising!!
Helping to create one though. Are you implying your ok with bribes? Could be dangerous thing to admit to in your industry....
 

Last edited:

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom