Unknown coin I think..

Kingrich

Full Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2015
Messages
176
Reaction score
410
Golden Thread
0
Location
RI
Detector(s) used
Equinox 800
Makro racer2
Garrett ATpro
FisherF2
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I dug this coin today in a section of woods in an area that dates back to the 1640’s.. it gave me jumpy readings on my AT max about 7-8” down. The metal is soft, easily bends.. maybe pewter?? It’s about the size of a large cent, and there is very little detail. Any ideas? ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1509827687.587987.webpImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1509827703.239752.webpImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1509827718.491047.webpImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1509827733.505256.webpImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1509827774.374727.webpImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1509827803.416433.webp
 

It’s very hard to tell, it has a definitive lip around the edge, but I’m completely stumped on any details. There’s something there..
 

Upvote 0
I’m getting a 51-52 on the AT max..
 

Upvote 0
Almost looks like lead where the crack is....
 

Upvote 0
I’m thinking it might be, I could bend it right in half if I wanted to. Maybe it was some kind of token or counterfeit coin??
 

Upvote 0
that line across it tells me it is a slug
 

Upvote 0
I’ve only found one Seated coin and it was counterfeit 1875 Seated Dime. IMG_1546.webp
I sent these pictures to a counterfeit expert and he sent me this.

“This one looks like a cast example using antimony. Antimony is quite brittle and these piece easily cracked. It is a contemporary piece which means made at roughly the same time as the date on the coin."


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Upvote 0
Some contemporary counterfeits I've recovered show the single raised line as does yours.
It's common enough that I believe it's a result of something in the clandestine manufacture process.
I had 12 different ones (mostly GII 1/2d copies) analyzed with XRF spectroscopy, all were composed of lead or lead/tin alloys (aka pewter)
with minor amounts of other elements.(inc. Sb, antimony)
I was told that the more minor elements present, the older the object likely is, makes sense to me because refining advances have resulted in availability of purer metals.
I think most early coin copiers used whatever scraps on hand for the crucible.
Want more period fakes? I often find them in the water near small bridges, as tollbooths would often be located here, and tollkeepers knew coinage better than most, apparently tossing these fakes into the drink.
unfortunately, many will have been cancelled by holing or flattening.
occasionally a beauty will be found, I have 2 exceptional GIIs, date showing and well preserved by salt water.
(and dozens of lesser, though identifiable coins)
Lead, pewter, and high carat gold being the only metals the sea treats kindly, most pewter blisters, but hard black blister is preferable to the flaking soft tan consistency of dry land recoveries imo.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom