ToddB64
Sr. Member
- Jan 7, 2007
- 418
- 73
- Detector(s) used
- Teknetics Gamma 6000,
Tesoro Bandido II µMax and
Compadre, White's Classic II,
Garrett Ace 250
- Primary Interest:
- Metal Detecting
Hello !
I have a Teknetics Gamma 6000, VLF, 7.8 kHZ and normally hunt for coins and jewelry in Discriminate mode.
I just realized that I haven't been using the method of checking the breakpoint of targets by using numbers 10, 40, 55, 60, etc., etc. on the Gamma screen to determine the likelihood of a good or trash target (and whether or not to dig). This would be similar to "Thumbing" the Discrimination dial on a detector such as the Tesoro Compadre, only with a digital machine (The Gamma).
I read a post sometime ago where the author recommended thumbing upscale and then back
downscale to the breakpoint, as he believed this method to be more accurate for arriving at the true breakpoint, however, he was using a Tesoro Compadre, VLF 12 kHz, single rotary Discrimination dial (no digital display screen). I believe the Compadre would fall into the category of "analog" circuitry. I don't know if this makes any difference, whether you are using an analog or digital detector, when employing the "downscale-to-the-true-breakpoint" method; any opinions on this ?
So before starting to use either one of the breakpoint techniques on my next hunt, I would like some feedback from other detectorists who have employed the "upscale only" technique, as well as the "upscale-downscale" technique described above, using the Gamma 6000, to tell me how accurate they have found these breakpoint methods to be....detailed examples follow:
If the screen is bouncing between 53 - 54 Foil, how likely is it that the target is actually a Nickel in the 55-60 upscale category ? Likewise, if the screen is bouncing between 55 - 57 in the upscale Nickel category, how likely is the target actually a piece of Foil in the 40 - 55 downscale category ??
I hope this post was written well enough so you could understand, but if you have any questions or need clarifications before giving your feedback, feel free to ask.
Thanks,
ToddB64
I have a Teknetics Gamma 6000, VLF, 7.8 kHZ and normally hunt for coins and jewelry in Discriminate mode.
I just realized that I haven't been using the method of checking the breakpoint of targets by using numbers 10, 40, 55, 60, etc., etc. on the Gamma screen to determine the likelihood of a good or trash target (and whether or not to dig). This would be similar to "Thumbing" the Discrimination dial on a detector such as the Tesoro Compadre, only with a digital machine (The Gamma).
I read a post sometime ago where the author recommended thumbing upscale and then back
downscale to the breakpoint, as he believed this method to be more accurate for arriving at the true breakpoint, however, he was using a Tesoro Compadre, VLF 12 kHz, single rotary Discrimination dial (no digital display screen). I believe the Compadre would fall into the category of "analog" circuitry. I don't know if this makes any difference, whether you are using an analog or digital detector, when employing the "downscale-to-the-true-breakpoint" method; any opinions on this ?
So before starting to use either one of the breakpoint techniques on my next hunt, I would like some feedback from other detectorists who have employed the "upscale only" technique, as well as the "upscale-downscale" technique described above, using the Gamma 6000, to tell me how accurate they have found these breakpoint methods to be....detailed examples follow:
If the screen is bouncing between 53 - 54 Foil, how likely is it that the target is actually a Nickel in the 55-60 upscale category ? Likewise, if the screen is bouncing between 55 - 57 in the upscale Nickel category, how likely is the target actually a piece of Foil in the 40 - 55 downscale category ??
I hope this post was written well enough so you could understand, but if you have any questions or need clarifications before giving your feedback, feel free to ask.
Thanks,
ToddB64
Last edited: