the blindbowman
Bronze Member
- Nov 21, 2006
- 1,379
- 30
what are the odds ..
some site may not be the part of the normal odds of treasure legends ,, my site #4 is a great exsample of this
one location yet dozens of pionts of interest have taken place at site #4 , the secerd place dates to IMHO about 13,000 BC or older . yet at one piont the tribes went under ground in the catcoms that have a enterence at site #4 when the upper earth was no longer safe ,, only to reappear aroud the folsum era...from then on the site is taken by war and raits and massacre and death and nature only to be past from one legend to the next till the site is lost and never recoverd ...
i find the odds so unbeleiveable it added to the lost of this site ..
if i did not under stand the ture history of this site i would not beleive this was posable at all , yet this is a real site ...
lets talk about the fact is it posable to have a site like this ... i know frist hand what i have seen and i know thi site is real but often so many of you dont beleive what i have told you .could only make me question what do you beleive is posable to start with ...?
IMHO if you told me i have told you . i would most likely not beleive site #4 could be real ether ...so i agree with you about the odds ..
yet site is not a dream or some vission of RV ... its a reality a real location coverd over so well no one saw it ...but i dont hunt the way others do ...my sense guide me and site #4 has taken years to define,,....
is site #4 the exception to rule of normal odds ....?
did the seerd place have unearthy powers that caused this ...?
i have done as much as i can to kept this site from the public until it could be defind and soon it will be public ..so what do you think .. how many sites are out there and are their other sites like site #4 waithing for one of you to locate it with as much research and time and money as i have had to put forth to just define this type of site ... ?
the everything site .. reality or confussion ...?
some site may not be the part of the normal odds of treasure legends ,, my site #4 is a great exsample of this
one location yet dozens of pionts of interest have taken place at site #4 , the secerd place dates to IMHO about 13,000 BC or older . yet at one piont the tribes went under ground in the catcoms that have a enterence at site #4 when the upper earth was no longer safe ,, only to reappear aroud the folsum era...from then on the site is taken by war and raits and massacre and death and nature only to be past from one legend to the next till the site is lost and never recoverd ...
i find the odds so unbeleiveable it added to the lost of this site ..
if i did not under stand the ture history of this site i would not beleive this was posable at all , yet this is a real site ...
lets talk about the fact is it posable to have a site like this ... i know frist hand what i have seen and i know thi site is real but often so many of you dont beleive what i have told you .could only make me question what do you beleive is posable to start with ...?
IMHO if you told me i have told you . i would most likely not beleive site #4 could be real ether ...so i agree with you about the odds ..
yet site is not a dream or some vission of RV ... its a reality a real location coverd over so well no one saw it ...but i dont hunt the way others do ...my sense guide me and site #4 has taken years to define,,....
is site #4 the exception to rule of normal odds ....?
did the seerd place have unearthy powers that caused this ...?
i have done as much as i can to kept this site from the public until it could be defind and soon it will be public ..so what do you think .. how many sites are out there and are their other sites like site #4 waithing for one of you to locate it with as much research and time and money as i have had to put forth to just define this type of site ... ?
the everything site .. reality or confussion ...?