bigscoop
Gold Member
- Jun 4, 2010
- 13,535
- 9,072
- Detector(s) used
- Older blue Excal with full mods, Equinox 800.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Here we go...part one...."the truth behind the narration";
The narration was a publication filled with fiction and little fact and it was designed for two vastly different audiences, one being the gullible and unwary reader, as ECS identifies them, or for the most part the general public. The letters maintained this same design, the only way the author could present just enough fact without disclosing too much of the actual truth. But why did he do this?
The author was someone who held great knowledge about the true events he was attempting to detail to those who might still hold knowledge of them and, hopefully, knowledge of the one thing he still desperately required, this being that referenced “unintelligible” and “missing piece of paper” he eluded to in the narration. As for the two remaining unsolved ciphers, hopefuls actually had no possible chance of arriving an accurate clear text for them since they had been seriously altered from the originals. This is why Ward was assigned the duty of playing representative, or middle man, so even if someone did have that missing piece of paper they would still have to work through/with the unknown author in order for it do them any good.
This was the design of the Beale publication, not simply to lure the unwary reader, as many believe, but rather to lure the aware reader should one still exist.
So what about the portion of the narration concerning Morriss and his establishment, the information about a man named Beale having stayed there on two different occasions? Well, this was likely all true, however, the portion about Morriss having no knowledge about Beale and his party wasn't. In fact, Morriss knew everything there was to know about the Beale and his party and their objective. And yes, I did say, “their objective.”
The portion of the story about Beale and his associates having actively recruited men for the adventure was very close to the actual truth, these being men who were eventually recruited and selected for a covert military style operation, though more accurately, a covert Secret Service action, the Morriss establishment serving as that mission's safe house, just has it had always been intended right from the very beginning. The author makes it very clear in those bogus letters that men in the party knew Morriss, it being at their alleged suggestion that Beale pay visit to this reputable and trustworthy man. So how could know all of this about Morriss if they didn't know him? On top of this the author makes this awareness perfectly clear again when he alleges that Morriss even knew where the men who had accompanied Beale to his establishment lived, that being near Richmond. How could he possible know this if he didn't know them? So very clearly Morriss was part of the enterprise right from the very beginning, the entire narration the product of both creative fiction and truth. This is also why the publication was only circulated in the center of the nest, if you will.
I also need to mention that there exist many inaccuracies in the history of the United States Secret Service, most insisting that the Secret Service wasn't conceived until 1860/61 with a budget of just $10'000. This is in sharp conflict where other official documents detail the existence of the Secret Service and a budget of $50'000 as early as 1812. There does exist reasons for the confusion, most of these having to do with an official definition of duties for the Secret Service that was outlined in 1861, whereas prior to this there was no such official definition of duties. So make no mistake, the Secret Service had existed long before the 60's, their activities being solely up to the President and his Generals.
As further evidence to the above, Chief Justice John Marshall, who is referenced in the Beale narration, also gave an opinion in regards to the Secret Service and its application when he cited that such intelligence was vital in a General's ability to make decisions. Need I remind you that the unknown author of the Beale pamphlet also references Jackson in the same breath with Marshall for this same exact reason. Coles, he was liaison and personal secretary to Monroe who, in 1812, used the entire Secret Service budget to purchase a series of fraudulent letters from a man named John Henry. James Monroe was president from 1817 to 1825, the same years when Jackson invaded Florida and the entire period of the Beale adventures. Beale's alleged party was also formed in 1817 and it lasted at least until 1822. Remember also that according to the unknown author both Marshall and Jackson had allegedly stayed at the Morriss establishment, as did Coles, so very clearly Morriss knew these men as well. Jackson and Beale became associates “at least as early” 1814/15 during the battle of New Orleans and its preparations, Beale even being from the exact same Lynchburg region. The Declaration of independence is the alleged key to C2, this a document that was penned by Thomas Jefferson, yet another resident of this same region. So from just what I've already referenced you should see what all of the above is establishing and where it is all eventually heading.
This, and more, was the general design and purpose of the Beale narration, to expose these truths to only those who already held knowledge about them with the hope of drawing them, and that missing paper, into the fold.
The narration was a publication filled with fiction and little fact and it was designed for two vastly different audiences, one being the gullible and unwary reader, as ECS identifies them, or for the most part the general public. The letters maintained this same design, the only way the author could present just enough fact without disclosing too much of the actual truth. But why did he do this?
The author was someone who held great knowledge about the true events he was attempting to detail to those who might still hold knowledge of them and, hopefully, knowledge of the one thing he still desperately required, this being that referenced “unintelligible” and “missing piece of paper” he eluded to in the narration. As for the two remaining unsolved ciphers, hopefuls actually had no possible chance of arriving an accurate clear text for them since they had been seriously altered from the originals. This is why Ward was assigned the duty of playing representative, or middle man, so even if someone did have that missing piece of paper they would still have to work through/with the unknown author in order for it do them any good.
This was the design of the Beale publication, not simply to lure the unwary reader, as many believe, but rather to lure the aware reader should one still exist.
So what about the portion of the narration concerning Morriss and his establishment, the information about a man named Beale having stayed there on two different occasions? Well, this was likely all true, however, the portion about Morriss having no knowledge about Beale and his party wasn't. In fact, Morriss knew everything there was to know about the Beale and his party and their objective. And yes, I did say, “their objective.”
The portion of the story about Beale and his associates having actively recruited men for the adventure was very close to the actual truth, these being men who were eventually recruited and selected for a covert military style operation, though more accurately, a covert Secret Service action, the Morriss establishment serving as that mission's safe house, just has it had always been intended right from the very beginning. The author makes it very clear in those bogus letters that men in the party knew Morriss, it being at their alleged suggestion that Beale pay visit to this reputable and trustworthy man. So how could know all of this about Morriss if they didn't know him? On top of this the author makes this awareness perfectly clear again when he alleges that Morriss even knew where the men who had accompanied Beale to his establishment lived, that being near Richmond. How could he possible know this if he didn't know them? So very clearly Morriss was part of the enterprise right from the very beginning, the entire narration the product of both creative fiction and truth. This is also why the publication was only circulated in the center of the nest, if you will.
I also need to mention that there exist many inaccuracies in the history of the United States Secret Service, most insisting that the Secret Service wasn't conceived until 1860/61 with a budget of just $10'000. This is in sharp conflict where other official documents detail the existence of the Secret Service and a budget of $50'000 as early as 1812. There does exist reasons for the confusion, most of these having to do with an official definition of duties for the Secret Service that was outlined in 1861, whereas prior to this there was no such official definition of duties. So make no mistake, the Secret Service had existed long before the 60's, their activities being solely up to the President and his Generals.
As further evidence to the above, Chief Justice John Marshall, who is referenced in the Beale narration, also gave an opinion in regards to the Secret Service and its application when he cited that such intelligence was vital in a General's ability to make decisions. Need I remind you that the unknown author of the Beale pamphlet also references Jackson in the same breath with Marshall for this same exact reason. Coles, he was liaison and personal secretary to Monroe who, in 1812, used the entire Secret Service budget to purchase a series of fraudulent letters from a man named John Henry. James Monroe was president from 1817 to 1825, the same years when Jackson invaded Florida and the entire period of the Beale adventures. Beale's alleged party was also formed in 1817 and it lasted at least until 1822. Remember also that according to the unknown author both Marshall and Jackson had allegedly stayed at the Morriss establishment, as did Coles, so very clearly Morriss knew these men as well. Jackson and Beale became associates “at least as early” 1814/15 during the battle of New Orleans and its preparations, Beale even being from the exact same Lynchburg region. The Declaration of independence is the alleged key to C2, this a document that was penned by Thomas Jefferson, yet another resident of this same region. So from just what I've already referenced you should see what all of the above is establishing and where it is all eventually heading.
This, and more, was the general design and purpose of the Beale narration, to expose these truths to only those who already held knowledge about them with the hope of drawing them, and that missing paper, into the fold.
Last edited:
