Supreme Court, attorney for US DOJ to appear on behalf of United States

[winners58]

in the California Supreme Court case, attorney for US DOJ to appear on behalf of United States
California Courts - Appellate Court Case Information
.
Obama sends in the US DOJ on a CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUE?
beat down the lowly miner, write or call your congressman ASAP.
.
42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage,
of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected,
any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law,
suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.
Section 1983 legal definition of Section 1983
.
could be they are just representing the US, did a search for
Aaron Peter Avila & Lane N. McFadden
some high profile cases against environment groups come up.
wait and see I guess.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

DR.ÖTEK Metal Detector, Waterproof Gold Detector, Pinpoint & Terrain Modes, Professional Metal Detector - Grab it through Amazon!

[goldenIrishman]

Link wouldn't work for me Winner.

 

[winners58]

link is correct, should come back up later, lots of activity

 

[Hoser John]

You ain't seen or heard nuttn' yet as the Green machine throws millions at politicians to kill mining in the US....it spreads-John

 

[goldenIrishman]

This one's for you John....BUt we should make them required for all of the politicos.

 

[Oakview2]

The federal government is to foster the exploration and harvesting of minerals. Providing DOJ lawyers is in direct violation of federal law.

 

[2cmorau]

i guess this is legal one attorney writing for all these different groups,
just thought i post it, show what we are up agaisn't
Title Eight Rules - rules_of_court
Title Nine Rules - rules_of_court

Amicus curiae: Karuk Tribe
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: Center for Biology Diversity
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: Friends of the River
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: Klamath Riverkeeper
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: Institute for Fisheries Resources
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: Enviromental Law Foundation
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: Foothill Angler's Coalition
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: North Fork American River Alliance
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: Upper American River Foundation
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

Amicus curiae: Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center
Attorney: Jonathan Carter Evans

 

[ratled]

Johnathon has been the attorney for the Center, the tribe and several others through out all of the SB stuff. He is working with Lyn Saxton the other co attorney for these groups. He is just tweaking what he has already in his computer, changing the cover and sending it out again. Nothing new here - literally.

ratled

 

[Hoser John]

AND making millions from plagerism....sic sic eco bs...John

 

[ratled]

Keep in mind that this is a criminal case and has two specific charges 5653.1 Dredging w/o a permit and 5653.9 possession of a suction dredge w/in 300' of a closed water way. All of this birds & the bees stuff should not pertain to this case. The opposition is trying to fast track this to by pass SB, any court of appeals stuff and go straight to the Supreme court. Although these days I'm not sure if I am more apt to see Bigfoot on my claim rather than the blind Lady Justice in a CA court room.

Remember, Brandon has yet to have a his fair trail. The trial court denied him federal evidence. The 3rd Appellate only set aside his conviction and confirmed that he should be allowed to present his federal evidence should the lower court choose to retry him.

ratled

As always -PLEASE help Brandon

James Buchal
C/O Brandon Rinehart case
3425 S.E. Yamhill, Suite 100,
Portland , OR 97214