jim4silver
Silver Member
- Apr 15, 2008
- 3,662
- 495
In my semi-constant evaluation of the gold and silver markets, I am always wondering if I should have more gold than silver, more silver than gold, all gold, all silver, or none of either. I ran across an interesting article posted on goldseek.com. The link is posted below. The author seems to state that there is less silver available than gold. And that it has been estimated that silver will be the first element in the periodic table to become extinct (by 2020).
If this is true, it makes me want to be more silver-heavy, especially since silver has industrial uses and it gets used up unlike gold, which is more recycled for the most part.
There is also that whole gold confiscation issue. I don't think it will happen, but if it does then silver would be better to own. I don't believe there would be a silver confiscation. The big dogs (governments, central banks) I feel consider gold "money" more than silver, even though silver was used in coins here for so long. Therefore, if they confiscated a PM to make their currency more desireable, I would think they would do it to gold instead of silver.
I have read in some posts/articles from time to time that silver was confiscated in 1933 like gold, but that is BS in that we had silver currency circulating until 1964. It took a presidential executive order in 1974? by Pres Ford to make it legal of us to own gold bullion again. I guess they could try to confiscate silver if they think they need it for industrial uses perhaps.
Any thoughts?
http://news.silverseek.com/SilverInvestor/1249613056.php
Jim
If this is true, it makes me want to be more silver-heavy, especially since silver has industrial uses and it gets used up unlike gold, which is more recycled for the most part.
There is also that whole gold confiscation issue. I don't think it will happen, but if it does then silver would be better to own. I don't believe there would be a silver confiscation. The big dogs (governments, central banks) I feel consider gold "money" more than silver, even though silver was used in coins here for so long. Therefore, if they confiscated a PM to make their currency more desireable, I would think they would do it to gold instead of silver.
I have read in some posts/articles from time to time that silver was confiscated in 1933 like gold, but that is BS in that we had silver currency circulating until 1964. It took a presidential executive order in 1974? by Pres Ford to make it legal of us to own gold bullion again. I guess they could try to confiscate silver if they think they need it for industrial uses perhaps.
Any thoughts?
http://news.silverseek.com/SilverInvestor/1249613056.php
Jim