BurntBear
Bronze Member
- Jul 4, 2014
- 1,450
- 1,303
- Detector(s) used
- Shovels....lots of shovels!
- Primary Interest:
- Other
Ok, I've been racking my brain the past few days. I had a request from fellow TN'er, Jim_in_Idaho requesting to see some of the Rubies I've posted under long-wave ultraviolet lighting. Thanks Jim...that was not an easy task...lol.
I quickly came to the realization that standard glass camera lenses don't capture the fluorescence that you see in person. Internet resources recommend Quartz or Fluorite lenses that are astronomical in price. So, after hours of research and not finding a remedy; I decided to take a step back and think for a second. What filters UV lighting on a daily basis? I grabbed my high-definition, impact resistant motorcycle sunglasses and placed them over the camera lens....
This is the result captured at 380nm:
This is the same specimen under standard incandescent lighting:
Here is a rough crystal specimen:
And under regular lighting:
More to come very coon! Thanks for looking! -Luke
I quickly came to the realization that standard glass camera lenses don't capture the fluorescence that you see in person. Internet resources recommend Quartz or Fluorite lenses that are astronomical in price. So, after hours of research and not finding a remedy; I decided to take a step back and think for a second. What filters UV lighting on a daily basis? I grabbed my high-definition, impact resistant motorcycle sunglasses and placed them over the camera lens....
This is the result captured at 380nm:
This is the same specimen under standard incandescent lighting:
Here is a rough crystal specimen:
And under regular lighting:
More to come very coon! Thanks for looking! -Luke
Last edited: