Ring markings

lawsonland

Full Member
Oct 1, 2007
223
295
Pennsylvania
Detector(s) used
Currently use CTX, Excalibur
Have used V3I, DFX, BHID, ATX, Etrac, TDI, Infinium
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • ring close2.jpg
    ring close2.jpg
    164.4 KB · Views: 97
  • ring mark.jpg
    ring mark.jpg
    1.9 KB · Views: 125
  • ring close.jpg
    ring close.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 78
Sorry, pics are too blurry to make out marks. 375 is 9 karat gold. Au means gold (if it's Au not ag). Are you sure it's not "VVSI" instead of "WSI"? VVSI is a grade of the clarity of the diamonds most likely. VVSI is closest to flawless I think.
 

Upvote 0
AG may be the maker AG & Sons out of the U.K.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Upvote 0
Google Antique Jewellery University (I kid you not) and go to jewely makers' marks. Could it be Aisenstein & Gordon, Philadelphia PA USA, c.1934 712-14 Sansom St. Philadelphia PA?
 

Upvote 0
Heh...

AG = "Almost gold" :P ... just kidding. :)

9k is still gold yes.... but barely :P
 

Upvote 0
I think you may be right about AG & Sons. The name is it is European and it looks similar to the rings on the site.
But I can't find what their markers mark looks like.
The ring has a slanted "A" and a "G" I outline it
 

Attachments

  • ring%20mark.jpg
    ring%20mark.jpg
    2.3 KB · Views: 90
Upvote 0
I think you may be right about AG & Sons. The name is it is European and it looks similar to the rings on the site.
But I can't find what their markers mark looks like.
The ring has a slanted "A" and a "G" I outline it
I thought maybe a European maker because 375 is a European mark. I too looked for their makers mark, but kept getting bottles of bourbon with red wax tops.....
 

Upvote 0
I agree it may be the rating of the diamond here is a list

Flawless (no inclusions under 10x loupe)
IF (internally flawless, surface blemishes exist)
VVS 1, 2 (very, very slightly included: minute inclusions)
VS 1, 2 (very slightly included: minor inclusions)
SI 1, 2 (slightly included: noticeable inclusions)
I 1, 2, 3 (included: observable inclusions)

(copied from Diamond Grading - Understanding Carat, Clarity, Color, Cut)

the 0.015 could refer to the diamonds Carat.
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top