Given the controversy about LRLs, let me ask this: I have a probable shipwreck site on the Oregon coast where the wreck is buried 10 feet under a tidal mud flat. It is at the mouth of a river, but the water is sufficiently salty that the mud is impregnated with it.
The site is only some fifty feet off shore, and at negative tides you can walk across the mud flat and stand over the site. Alternatively you can stand on shore and have an unobstructed line to the wreck, which would only be some 60 feet away.
I used White's deep penetrating metal detector and got a strong signal, but this model does not discriminate between different types of metal. I think it possible that this wreck contains a substantial amount of silver bullion.
What is the best method of confirming the presence of silver and other possible materials on this wreck?
Thanks,
Mariner
The site is only some fifty feet off shore, and at negative tides you can walk across the mud flat and stand over the site. Alternatively you can stand on shore and have an unobstructed line to the wreck, which would only be some 60 feet away.
I used White's deep penetrating metal detector and got a strong signal, but this model does not discriminate between different types of metal. I think it possible that this wreck contains a substantial amount of silver bullion.
What is the best method of confirming the presence of silver and other possible materials on this wreck?
Thanks,
Mariner