- Feb 3, 2009
- 42,799
- 164,470
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 1
- Detector(s) used
- Deus, Deus 2, Minelab 3030, E-Trac,
- Primary Interest:
- Relic Hunting
Just gleamed the forums and nothing stuck out (or totally missed it) 
Question: Is there a forum that is for link references only?
Say for ID/age of Tokens/Crotal bells/Square Nails/Horseshoes/Headstamps/Bottles/sterling .925..........
It seems that folks are always looking for help on a find, or an ID, as they know what it is-but not the information relevant to that actual recovery.
We all probably have our own little squirrelled away references to sites that specialize in one subject.
Old maps-each time the subject comes up there are references to certain maps.
Same as most things, we spend countless hours searching for something that is there-but unable to find the actual link to that topic.
Search engines are SO FILTERED now in today's world-enter something-it thinks something entirely different-and then the algorithm keeps throwing silly crap out.
The image section of say Google is a joke at times.
Not any use lots of times as it's what ever anybody posts up wrong in the first place.
So would it be so handy place/section dealing specifically to reference links.
I'm sure it would grow into a library of immense knowledge that folks would contribute to, and enjoy for years to come.
Question: Is there a forum that is for link references only?
Say for ID/age of Tokens/Crotal bells/Square Nails/Horseshoes/Headstamps/Bottles/sterling .925..........
It seems that folks are always looking for help on a find, or an ID, as they know what it is-but not the information relevant to that actual recovery.
We all probably have our own little squirrelled away references to sites that specialize in one subject.
Old maps-each time the subject comes up there are references to certain maps.
Same as most things, we spend countless hours searching for something that is there-but unable to find the actual link to that topic.
Search engines are SO FILTERED now in today's world-enter something-it thinks something entirely different-and then the algorithm keeps throwing silly crap out.
The image section of say Google is a joke at times.
Not any use lots of times as it's what ever anybody posts up wrong in the first place.
So would it be so handy place/section dealing specifically to reference links.
I'm sure it would grow into a library of immense knowledge that folks would contribute to, and enjoy for years to come.
Last edited:
