Question about a paleo site.

If their not , I am. My best paleo site is a backwater spring site. It is deflated by erosion so the aechies were not intrested. They measured my points in a survey, a guy named Brooster who works with Stanford ?? , the paleo archaeological guru. Sites that have been plowed or eroded do not attract their attention.
 

I have a pal named "captain clovis" I'll bet he'd like to check out that old paleo site . lmao
 

Captain Clovis would need a change of under ware after seeing this site. Springs, chert/chalk/limestone deposits within walking distance. It is a "shuck" site. That is what I call it, the Natives were replacing their points so the base to whole ratio thirty= to one. But gwad at the bases. Large keel flakes, large core reduction flakes, uniface tools, patina so thick the Camden chert is unidentifiable. It is a once a year love affair when the lake level is dropped. No TVA crap to worry about.Three miles off the river bank. Hoping for a good rain before summer pool covers it. Perhaps some pictures are in order?? Will be there tomorrow, may take the camera. Make Captain Clovis slobber and foam at the mouth??
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top