🔎 UNIDENTIFIED Possibly Navy Button ?

creade

Bronze Member
Jun 23, 2013
1,207
1,698
n.h.
Detector(s) used
DEUS,root slayer
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • IMG_3492.jpeg
    IMG_3492.jpeg
    314.9 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_3493.jpeg
    IMG_3493.jpeg
    434.6 KB · Views: 12
I dug this today. I believe it's a Navy button but not sure. The front is brass , the back was iron so is all corroded. Anyone seen this before?
Not a button expert, but have dug 3-4 “navy” buttons like this. Appears to be brass front and tin back. Some of those were used in military, but as I understand the vast majority were civilian. Could be wrong about this particular button, but all mine are not military.
 

Upvote 2
Definitely a Civilian-usage "Fashion" button, from an Imitation navy pea-coat or other "nautical-themed" coat or jacket. Actual Military-Issue Navy buttons do not use an iron/steel back, because eventually that back will make a rust stain on the uniform jacket or coat.

Also, note that your button's emblem has a "pebbled background"... which is definitely a Civilian characteristic.

There are two exceptions I know of:
(1) A civil war era US Navy kepi-strap button sometimes had an iron back. Why? Iron is cheaper than brass, and the rust-stain doesn't show on the kepi-hat's leather chinstrap.
(2) Some varieties of actual Military-issue Confederate buttons had an iron back, due to the serious scarcity of brass in the wartime South.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 6
Definitely a Civilian-usage "Fashion" button, from an Imitation pea-coat or other "nautical-themed" coat or jacket. Actual Military-Issue Navy buttons do not use an iron/steel back, because eventually that back will make a rust stain on the uniform jacket or coat.

Also, note that your button's emblem has a "pebbled background"... which is definitely a Civilian characteristic.

There are two exceptions I know of:
(1) A civil war era US Navy kepi-strap button sometimes had an iron back. Why? Iron is cheaper than brass, and the rust-stain doesn't show on the kepi-hat's leather chinstrap.
(2) Some varieties of actual Military-issue Confederate buttons had an iron back, due to the serious scarcity of brass in the wartime South.
Do you have a date range?
 

Upvote 1
Creade asked:
> Do you have a date range [for my ironbacked button]?

Iron-back brass-front 2-piece buttons were first made in the latter 1830s... and are still being made today. The fact that yours does NOT have any of the variations of "self-shank back" (which first appear around 1900) means it can be from the earlier end of that time range. But it CAN still be from the 20th-Century. Sorry I cannot be any more specific than that. If I had to guess, I'd say it is from sometime in the second half of the 1800s (1850s/90s).
 

Upvote 2
Not a button expert, but have dug 3-4 “navy” buttons like this. Appears to be brass front and tin back. Some of those were used in military, but as I understand the vast majority were civilian. Could be wrong about this particular button, but all mine are not military.
For reference, here are a few of the “military” buttons I have dug which I later learned were civilian. If the button guys got it wrong, please let me know.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3111.jpeg
    IMG_3111.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 10
  • IMG_3110.jpeg
    IMG_3110.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 10
Upvote 1
Creade asked:
> Do you have a date range [for my ironbacked button]?

Iron-back brass-front 2-piece buttons were first made in the latter 1830s... and are still being made today. The fact that yours does NOT have any of the variations of "self-shank back" (which first appear around 1900) means it can be from the earlier end of that time range. But it CAN still be from the 20th-Century. Sorry I cannot be any more specific than that. If I had to guess, I'd say it is from sometime in the second half of the 1800s (1850s/90s).
Thanks!
 

Upvote 1

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top