Perfect Nits?

Joe G from Md

Hero Member
Dec 23, 2017
618
1,637
Kentucky
Detector(s) used
Whites 6000Di Pro plus/ Whites 5900/ started with Whites 4900
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • 023.jpg
    023.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 72
  • 024.jpg
    024.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 94
Upvote 0
Nope. What did they hit and what was the effect on the target? Or the effect on the reason for the shot ( did it strike the target where desired).
Top right in second picture performed well.
Bullet mushroomed,expanding into about double the original diameter while tracking a straighter course than lopsided ones.
The medium struck matters. Clean sand is good for testing for a cheaper medium than ballistic gel.
Lower left in second pic struck a stone or other hard material and slid off/ around.

Perfect hits are subjective.
Nose first is good, but a tumbling bullet in warfare disabling a target is good too?
The energy from the charge being left in the target ....vs passing through , can be considered good.

Bullet design ,energy it carries when striking target , performance through target , studied together give a better idea.
Mattered less in warfare during the civil war ....when a minie ball shattered a limb ,that was good enough regardless of what the bullet looked like after.
 

Surprised no response on mistake in title, meant hits not nits little difference.
 

Surprised no response on mistake in title, meant hits not nits little difference.

Thank Goodness 'common sense ' explained your title or most of what I type would be unreadable.

I'm 46 & have not heard that exact term but the almost perfect mushroom effect on some of the bullets pictured makes for "a dead head on strike".

Funny ,,
I was at a civil War show & a seller had a pretty uncommon Enfield type for sale , I think it was around $15 ; then in another small riker case he had a Perfect Mushroom W/O any special cavity mark I could see for $18. ???
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top