It absolutely is an original painting. My parents spent weeks shopping at art/antique stores, and I remember as a kid thinking"that expensive!". My dad was not cheap.
I also moved this to the art and antique forum. Sorry if it is in the wrong place, thanks for the info. I'll check it out.
Jim
Thanks, although I do not know the conversion rate for that purchase. That painting looks very similar to mine. I will have to do some research on this and the artist. It appears that some of his works reside in museums.
Just tidying up some blasts from the past (including some very ancient ones), largely for the benefit of anyone searching the site for information.
Sorry, but these pictures signed as “C. Inness” and also “C. Innes” have no relationship to an artist of that name. It’s an invented (or borrowed) name and the back-story touted with them is fictitious or mis-associated, but has been so widely plastered across the net that this non-existent artist has taken on a life of his/her own. These pictures aren't even all painted by the same person. It’s original art in the sense of being hand-painted (or at least hand-finished) but came out of a factory in Asia.
Hundreds of them exist with similar themes, often incorporating formulaic imagery, with the same trees/lakes/bridges/waterfalls/cottages/cabins etc and only minor re-arrangements, or seen from a slightly different viewing aspect.
They were popularly sold in the 1980s from display boards rented in shopping centres and such along with other pictures having different fictitious signatures from the same factories, selling for around $25 or so. They don’t fetch a lot more than that today, with $50 being a typical realistic eBay asking price.