IndianaSmith
Sr. Member
- Jul 21, 2007
- 434
- 4
OK, say we're shopping for a new MD
This is all hypothetical, because I'm not currently "shopping" (wishing yes, shopping no). Another post got me thinking about this though. Take someone who know's little about the actual "workings" of detectors, now this person say spend a year or two with a less-expensive detector, so they have a "feel" for that particular brand/model and the hobby itsself. Now they want to upgrade, say something with alittle more "power", depth, descrimination, ID, etc.
What does a person look for when upgrading? I mean I see posts all the time where someone asks for suggestions of a brand/model, or someone says "this is the one you need", another says "no, here's the one you want", that's all well & find, but how does the person doing the buying know he's truely getting what he wants?
OK, say I go to a dealer, grab a MD & go to a "test range" he has set-up....what can I expect to learn from that? Say I try 6 different MDs & 4 of them perform better than the other 2, how would one choose between the 4? I mean they all seem to do an equal job on the "test". It seems there's alot of brand-loyalty, which holds true with alot of products. Do you buy the name, then "whittle-down" to the one model to buy?
More money doesn't mean "more-better" ( ), right? I'd mentioned in another post about how intimidating it is/was for someone "new" (atleast for me) to look at all the models, read the data info......and scratch their head If someone asks 50 people to reccommend a detector, and 30 agree on 1 (lol, I know, fat-chance) would that MD suit the person who purchased it?
What would you tell a person in this situation? Buy it, sell it if you don't like it & try something else? I'd think a person could lose a fair amount of cash pretty quickly doing that. Would one be better-off to play "follow the leader" and take an "average" of what the top-20 "finders" on say this site are using?
What is the best unbiased advice you could give someone?
Thanks
Smitty
This is all hypothetical, because I'm not currently "shopping" (wishing yes, shopping no). Another post got me thinking about this though. Take someone who know's little about the actual "workings" of detectors, now this person say spend a year or two with a less-expensive detector, so they have a "feel" for that particular brand/model and the hobby itsself. Now they want to upgrade, say something with alittle more "power", depth, descrimination, ID, etc.
What does a person look for when upgrading? I mean I see posts all the time where someone asks for suggestions of a brand/model, or someone says "this is the one you need", another says "no, here's the one you want", that's all well & find, but how does the person doing the buying know he's truely getting what he wants?
OK, say I go to a dealer, grab a MD & go to a "test range" he has set-up....what can I expect to learn from that? Say I try 6 different MDs & 4 of them perform better than the other 2, how would one choose between the 4? I mean they all seem to do an equal job on the "test". It seems there's alot of brand-loyalty, which holds true with alot of products. Do you buy the name, then "whittle-down" to the one model to buy?
More money doesn't mean "more-better" ( ), right? I'd mentioned in another post about how intimidating it is/was for someone "new" (atleast for me) to look at all the models, read the data info......and scratch their head If someone asks 50 people to reccommend a detector, and 30 agree on 1 (lol, I know, fat-chance) would that MD suit the person who purchased it?
What would you tell a person in this situation? Buy it, sell it if you don't like it & try something else? I'd think a person could lose a fair amount of cash pretty quickly doing that. Would one be better-off to play "follow the leader" and take an "average" of what the top-20 "finders" on say this site are using?
What is the best unbiased advice you could give someone?
Thanks
Smitty