Obama Demands Vote On 2nd Amendment During Hartford Speech

Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
12,824
Reaction score
7,901
Golden Thread
0
Location
New Hampshire
Detector(s) used
Garret Master hunter Cx Plus
Primary Interest:
Other
Obama Demands Vote On 2nd Amendment During Hartford Speech

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 9, 2013

President Barack Obama traveled to Hartford, Connecticut on Monday and delivered a speech calling for a vote on the Second Amendment. He lashed out at Republicans who plan to resist attempts by Congress to destroy the right to bear firearms.



“Some folks in Washington are already floating the idea that they may use political stunts to prevent votes on any of these reforms,” Obama said. “They’re not just saying they’ll vote no on ideas that almost all Americans support. They’re saying they’ll do everything they can to even prevent any votes on these provisions.”

Obama’s use of the phrase “political stunts” is a reference to the possibility of a Senate filibuster to stop legislation.

On March 22, Republican senators Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid stating their intention to oppose any legislation threatening to destroy the constitutional right to bear arms.

“We, the undersigned, intend to oppose any legislation that would oppose on the American people’s constitutional right to bear arms, or on their ability to exercise this right without being subjected to government surveillance,” the letter states. “The Second Amendment to the Constitution protects citizens’ right to self-defense. It speaks to history’s lesson that government cannot be in all places at all times, and history’s warning about the oppression of a government that tries.”

The establishment media, led by the New York Times, has launched a campaign to portray Paul and more than a dozen other senators concerned about the future of the Constitution as obstructionists.

“The gun lobby is spreading the pernicious falsehood that a background check will lead to a gun registry, and a registry will lead to a knock on the front door by a government SWAT team intent on confiscating the nation’s weapons. Mr. Paul and the other signatories who share this belief have promised to filibuster that bill. And given his newfound interest in the dramatic arts, he is probably planning to perform in another C-Span marathon in the weeks to come,” the Time editorialized as Obama gave his speech in Hartford.

Chris Matthews and Rev. Al Sharpton told MSNBC’s diminished audience that most Americans want universal background checks – and hence registration and ultimately firearm confiscation – and demanded Republicans put aside their “partisanship” and allow Democrats in Congress to vote on a bill that will strike a blow to the cornerstone of the Constitution.

Matthews admitted MSNBC has consistently waged a war against the Second Amendment. “I think MSNBC and you and I and a bunch of other people on this network have been keeping up the fight for gun safety” since the Sandy Hook massacre, “not just a few times but consistently every night,” he said.

 

"It's not about me"? Really?

It's ALL ABOUT HIM!!!

Does he think no one can tell what a narcissist he is?
 

Some obviously can't...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

Obama said. “They’re not just saying they’ll vote no on ideas that almost all Americans support. They’re saying they’ll do everything they can to even prevent any votes on these provisions.”

And I've got some swampland in Florida I can sell you too Obama llama ding dong.Just because he says that most Americans support something doesn't mean it's so!
 

Sure is drawing the heat off illegal immigration, unemployment, business downturns and failures, gas prices, horrible housing markets and most of all Obamacare isn't it?
 

The number I heard quoted today was 52% AGAINST ANY KIND OF GUN CONTROL.

That hardly means that "almost everyone" supports his communist ideas.

I was always taught that 50% was 1/2 of everyone.

So, since more folks want it left alone, he needs to go back to school or change the rhetoric.

Even CNN reported the 52% (it was their slanted poll too . . . so probably closer to 70+%)

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/09/CNN-Poll-Obama-Is-Getting-Hammered-On-Guns
 

Some of our officials are crazy and some are liars, and occasionally we may find a sane one,, But not from Virginia senators.

Our newest Senator, Kaine. thinks 40% of guns are sold with no questions asked? He has always made things up though. Man these guys will say absolutely ANYTHING, because they can get away with it and no one calls them out on it.
"
That's why - after extensive discussion with our citizens (many are gun-owners like me) - I'm prepared to vote.
We need a better background record check system. The horrible shooting at Virginia Tech happened after a dangerous young man illegally bought weapons due to a loophole in the records check system. When we fixed it, we made Virginia safer. But too many gaps still exist, and more than 40 percent of gun sales occur with no check to ensure that purchasers are legally able to possess weapons."


The goofs whole story here. Makes me sick.
Kaine supports assault weapons ban - wdbj7.com
 

Sure is drawing the heat off illegal immigration, unemployment, business downturns and failures, gas prices, horrible housing markets and most of all Obamacare isn't it?


BINGO, HOME RUN!

Kill 2 birds with one stone, disarm American citizens and distract from real issues...
 

Sure is drawing the heat off illegal immigration, unemployment, business downturns and failures, gas prices, horrible housing markets and most of all Obamacare isn't it?

BINGO, HOME RUN!

Kill 2 birds with one stone, disarm American citizens and distract from real issues...

Thank goodness, thought I was the only one who put those things together. Was afraid the weirdness of the ObamallamaArmy postings was getting to me.

Standard magic act . . . or maybe "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" type of thing.
 

I guess it has been such a standard practice I don't think about it. But even on here we get some that can't remember one fiasco to the next. I sometimes feel I am the only one that remembers these things from day to day (except for you fine people, which is why I am here). We really are in trouble when this works on Half of the country.
 

Lordy you people are running scared! :laughing9:
 

Lordy you people are running scared! :laughing9:
I'd say the ones wanting to disarm honest citizens are the ones that are scared. Otherwise, why bother? The vast majority of these proposals will have no effect on crime. If they worked, Chicago would be a garden place, which it's not.
Jim
 

As i said on another thread..."has anyone said it would have an effect on crime"?
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top