newby with questions

notarichman

Tenderfoot
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Golden Thread
0
Location
murray, idaho
Detector(s) used
minelab xterra 705
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Where I live there are lots of mineral types. The variety makes metal detecting difficult. My detector only displays numbers. That means i either have to memorize or write down the numbers that correspond to the item I'm looking for. Some of these numbers are the same for many types of metal, i.e. 20 might represent gold, silver, copper, lead, aluminum. So I don't know which one it is picking up. The display also indicates depth with down pointing arrows, but doesn't display inches down...you have to guess that 3 down arrows means 3" or something bigger is 10" down.
My primary interests are finding ONE gold nugget big enough for me to pick up with two fingers and finding relics that are worth donating to the local museum. Yes, I want to be able to say that I found a nugget worth mentioning and display it. I'm not interested in hunting coins or jewelry, except for the relic side of my goals. My brother coin hunts and I occasionally join him though.

Now to my problems -- 1. there is a lot of galena, pyrite, chalcopyrite, antimony, silver, gold, and other ferrous minerals in the area. panning for gold doesn't work as well it seems because some of these minerals are actually heavier than black sands...which seems to be in big chunks, not sand sized. I can use a magnet to get some of the black magnetite out of the pan, but galena especially is hard to separate from the gold. This especially seems to hold true if the gold is embedded with another mineral (making it lighter). Any ideas on solving my problem?
2. My detector doesn't seem to differentiate between what is electrically conductive or magnetic. Does anyone know how to use the xterra 705 to do this? Since this area has lots of larger magnetic pieces and lots of conductive pieces and I don't know which I am picking up...
3. the xterra 705 has a prospecting mode and a coin hunting mode. In prospecting mode it will detect gold in fairly small amounts as long as it is not too far away. In coin mode it will only detect gold if there is a fair amount of it, i.e. a gold ring or coin. In prospecting mode it just sounds off when detecting, while in coin mode it displays a number which is supposed to correspond with types of metals. This means that I can only estimate the type of metal I detect in coin mode, but I am trying to detect gold in prospecting mode in fairly small quantities. any solutions? I can switch back and forth between modes quickly and do, but if it isn't detected in coin mode; then I have no clue as to what I am detecting or how deep it is.
4. Because there is a lot of ferrous minerals and a lot of old iron objects such as nails, horseshoes, iron rails, and metal roofing buried in the ground, i either have to continually turn on and off the iron eliminating filters, keep it in coin mode, or keep it in all metal mode and dig up everything (every six inches there seems to be something). On top of that the iron rusts, making it spread out and appear larger and the ferrous minerals become electrically conductive when water is present, but when dug up they no longer conduct and the signal disappears. any ideas???
Thanks for any advice.
 

First, make sure you are using the correct coil, and that it is tuned to your machine. Most of the guys nuggetshooting with the 705 are using the 18.75kHz coil 10" x 5" Double-D 18.75 kHz Coil | Minelab Metal Detector Coils The hard truth is gold nugget hunting is an All Metal, no discrimination venture. That is why the serious prospectors use Minelab SD and GPX pulse induction machines. There are no EASY answers - sorry. As far as heavies, remember that gold is 19-times heavier than water, and 8- 12- times heavier than ANY other metal in your pan (magnatite, hematite, iron - whatever). You just need to improve your panning technique. We pan Arizona black sands all the time and it is slow, steady work but, the gold is always the last thing in the pan.
 

Thanks for the input. I am using that coil, but am not used to metal detecting or panning. I'm a rank beginner. I also have a Falcon Md 20 and a pinpointer. today i panned about a cubic foot of gravel i got from under and downstream of a huge rock with no gold found. afterwards I waved the falcon over the 1/4 minus and got 3 hits, two magnetic and one not(none of the 3 registered as magnetic). None look like gold. So i'm still confused. I plan on crushing the one rock that is not magnetic and looking at it again with the microscope...maybe silver inside?
I understand that lead is about a quarter of the weight of gold -- suppose i should say specific gravity. combined with sulfur to form galena I suppose that lowers it a bit lighter (geology.com says 7.5) Now if you find gold in a matrix of quartz for example and presuming the gold is only half of the rock...quartz specific gravity is 2.6, gold is 19.3, specific gravity of the rock is about 10.95...that's pretty close to galena. if there is more quartz than gold -- probably true! then the rock's specific gravity is less...making the rock NOT the "heaviest rock in the pan".
I can't afford a new or used minelab gpx or sd...so i will muddle along with what i have and try to learn how to use it for now.
 

Hello and welcome to the forum!

I am sure you will find the answers to many of your questions! Jump in & enjoy!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top