Need help on possible error 1/2 dollar

bay pirate

Full Member
Aug 26, 2012
203
169
Mobile Bay
Detector(s) used
Whites MXT Pro
What, if anything, do you guys think about this half dollar? It appears that it does not have the normal border from the strike. It almost looks smaller or double struck maybe. Any thoughts would be appreciated


image-1711278381.jpg



image-2946765060.jpg



image-4125473718.jpg



image-4005765394.jpg
 

It just looks like it was weakly struck and/or struck through grease. Nothing that would add any value. Maybe nothing is unusual with it.

Better pictures would help for a more accurate answer, but that is what I see.
 

Yes, it was weakly struck due to improper striking pressure! This also resulted in not forcing the plantchet metal outwards to properly form a complete rim.


Frank
 

Comparing a 1986 half dollar to a 1972 half is like comparing apples to oranges. In 1972 the dies had more relief and thus displaced more metal when struck leaving a fully struck rim, fast forward to 86 the relief was lowered several times along with reworking the dies leaving us with less detail and lesser rims. If the coin was to be weakly struck i would expect to see numbers and letters fading into the rim or half missing along with flat or missing hair detail and although your coin is not fully struck its not weak enough to be considered weakly struck. That is why top pops or fully struck coins command such premiums even the 1986's because when it comes to clad coinage fully struck appealing coins are a serious rarity. The coin you have I would consider on the weak side but not enough to be considered error.

Here is several examples.... Take note of the much thicker rims on the 72's

1972

mfVZ7819MXjoDTISwyu4eGA.jpg


images



images


1986

1986dbuhalf.jpg

images


images
 

Last edited:
I appreciate the feedback. It appeared odd to me so I asked. I'll keep digging. Thanks
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top