Need help interpreting LIDAR

robertk

Silver Member
May 16, 2023
2,718
13,259
Missouri
Detector(s) used
XP Deus II
White's Spectra v3i
Garrett Ultra GTA 1000
Whites Coinmaster
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
From my admittedly limited understanding of LIDAR, I thought the point of it was to show ground disturbance while ignoring vegetation. Right?

So here are two images of an area I'm hunting right now. On the left is the satellite image and on the right is the LIDAR image, taken of the same place and at the same scale.

Screenshot of Safari (9-1-23, 4-36-13 PM).png Screenshot of Safari (9-1-23, 4-35-35 PM).png

But having walked that ground, here's my questions...

1. There are two known ground disturbances -- a cellar hole and a presumed privy hole. Both of them were filled in long ago and I see NO TRACE of them on the LIDAR (both of them should be in the horizontal center of the image, just above vertical center, in the part that is slightly greener than the rest). Is that to be expected for a hole that was filled in years ago?

2. There are several "bumps" or blobs on the LIDAR image that seem to correspond perfectly with trees in the satellite image. Note the round bump in the upper left quadrant and all the round bumps in the lower right quadrant. All of them seem to align with trees. However, there isn't a bump for every tree, so I'm confused of what this means. When I walk the ground there, I do not note any obvious dip or hill around any of the trees. What should I make of this?

3. There is a rectangular thing in the upper left quarter of the lower right quadrant (I'm starting to sound like a land surveyor...). Is that really "something"? What would you guys think it would indicate? I've walked that area and don't see anything visible.

4. The top center of the image is a grove of silver maple trees. That shows as a rough area on the LIDAR. It is brushy and thick in person. I have an old map (1940's) that shows a building in approximately that area. Does anything in the LIDAR say "building" to you?

Thanks for any hints.
 

I’m gonna get back to this tomorrow I promise. Gatta have time to prepare my PowerPoint presentation. 🤓🤣
 

From my admittedly limited understanding of LIDAR, I thought the point of it was to show ground disturbance while ignoring vegetation. Right?
So here are two images of an area I'm hunting right now. On the left is the satellite image and on the right is the LIDAR image, taken of the same place and at the same scale.

But having walked that ground, here's my questions...

1. There are two known ground disturbances -- a cellar hole and a presumed privy hole. Both of them were filled in long ago and I see NO TRACE of them on the LIDAR (both of them should be in the horizontal center of the image, just above vertical center, in the part that is slightly greener than the rest). Is that to be expected for a hole that was filled in years ago?

2. There are several "bumps" or blobs on the LIDAR image that seem to correspond perfectly with trees in the satellite image. Note the round bump in the upper left quadrant and all the round bumps in the lower right quadrant. All of them seem to align with trees. However, there isn't a bump for every tree, so I'm confused of what this means. When I walk the ground there, I do not note any obvious dip or hill around any of the trees. What should I make of this?

3. There is a rectangular thing in the upper left quarter of the lower right quadrant (I'm starting to sound like a land surveyor...). Is that really "something"? What would you guys think it would indicate? I've walked that area and don't see anything visible.

4. The top center of the image is a grove of silver maple trees. That shows as a rough area on the LIDAR. It is brushy and thick in person. I have an old map (1940's) that shows a building in approximately that area. Does anything in the LIDAR say "building" to you?

Thanks for any hints.
To get the best view of everything Im talking about below. You should click on My Pictures so they expand to full size. On a computer hopefully or you can pinch and zoom on a phone.

To begin with the image size of the photos you posted was so tiny i could barley make it out or mark it up correctly.(even after clicking on it, thought they were thumbnails) Im going to try and answer your questions first, then go into how i use lidar and hopefully this will help you out in the future when searching for sites.
Your Questions
#1 Short answer is YES. Whatever the state of the ground is when the drone, airplane or helicopter passes over head. That is what will be showing up on these images. So if the hole was filled in a week before the lidar mapping was done, it wont show much. OF course that all depends on how it was filled in. If it was part of a development or landscaping you have to imagine they had backhoes or other heavy machinery doing the work. So the ground will probably come out level and smooth like it was never there. If some homeowner was the one filling it in with shovels or something. You might be able to still see a slight depression or make out the foundation walls. Lidar cant measure density of soils and disturbances like GPR can. It just measures ground elevation thats all.
Check out the image below. Its a site i have never been to, but found in my first year of research before i even had a metal detector. So the first image is a lidar layer that was done in 2018. You can clearly see a cellar hole in the RED circle. (I will get to the other colors later in this post)
Screenshot (136).jpg


Now here is a lidar scan done recently. You can tell that someone purchased some property. My guess would be it follows the old stone walls since they usually still mark the present property boarders. (BLUE area) you can see that they put in a road and started what looks like a gravel pit(BROWN). But they also filled in that cellar hole(RED)My guess is to discourage people like us. Now if that filled in cellar hole was all by itself and i was scanning around looking for targets at the 600ft level, i would probably never have even marked it or zoomed in for a closer look. (But obviously because of all the other cellar holes and old roads i would be looking this place over real well.)
Screenshot (137).jpg


#2 Lidar will not show tress or bushes its kinda the whole point. But when a tree grows, its going to change the ground its in naturally. Its most likely going to raise the soil a little in the immediate area around it. As the tree gets bigger and taller so do its roots, so its going to lift up the ground a little with it. This might be such a minuscule amount that you can not really tell when out in the field. This is my theory any way, makes sense to me. Lidar doesn't show vegetation.

#3 You should find a way to draw on your photos. It makes it so much easier to communicate things you may see in a picture. Both my iPhone and Microsoft surface have this labeled as "mark up". Its so simple to do, and i know you can do it with whatever device you are using. Some easy googling like "how to draw on photos with my xxxxxx" will get you there. Because of the size of your photo and not really knowing where you are talking about in the image, i cant really answer this one. But perhaps i circled it in your image below.

#4 I believe i see the spot you are talking about. Again its hard to make out because of the size of your image file. But i circled everything i could see. Now there is nothing on there that would scream to me good site. Like if i was searching large areas looking for sites to mark on a map and list. I wouldn't see anything here that would get me excited. But that is while im searching for large areas for potential sites. If i already had a permission or owned this property. Then i would go over the lidar with a fine tooth comb and mark any and all things. Because why not, i can go out and search for stuff to back up my marked anomalies. Of course if the property isnt that big or i had an old topo map that showed a building here. I wouldnt need lidar at all. I would just search the whole area until i found a concentration of iron, especially old nails. Then boom thats the building site, search accordingly.
Here are all the "anomalies" i found, bearing in mind the above paragraph and how small the image file is. Its tiny by the way, i posted below the "full image" thats how big it is. Looks like 1.5inch by 1.5 inch. Makes things kinda hard.
300378A1-C2C9-4879-95A1-317CBE2942CC.jpeg


so know im going into how i use lidar.
I use it mostly to look for potential sites. Also if the area is big enough or i have never been there. I use it on my phone, so i can walk myself over to the cellar hole im seeing on lidar. While searching large areas Im looking for cellar holes(RED), stone walls(GREEN), old roads or paths(PURPLE), and old farm fields(BLUE). Check out the photos below. This is an old 1800's village. Once you know what you are looking at. You can really get a sense of how everything was laid out. You can see the old rows in the farming field from the plow(BLUE AREA). You can see the old property lines from the stone walls(GREEN). you can see the main roads easily(PURPLE), but the smaller foot and cart paths are harder(PURPLE) But they can tell you a lot about the property. Where the outbuildings were, privy holes, etc. And of course the cellar holes of old buildings(RED) The pink is actually a new site i just found while drawing on this for this post. hurray
Screenshot (132).jpg

Screenshot (132).png


now all the RED boxes below are mostly in the shape of the corresponding cellar hole. These are all 100% cellar holes from the 1800's. I have been there and stood in them. So most of them i would feel confident in saying were house sites without even being there because of the shape,size,depth. Its because the foundations are still in good shape and have mostly not been filled in.
Screenshot (128).jpg


Like this next one i have never been to. But i would bet you anything that it is a cellar hole. This one is obviously in great shape. Noting has collapsed and looks to be cleaned out. From my experience this is pretty rare.
Screenshot (130).jpg


This is a place i have wanted to hunt forever but i have never been out there. Its in the middle of the woods. All the YELLOW ones i would bet anything are cellar holes. From their size and shape yes but also from the layout of roads and stone walls. Like see how the GREEN area is almost cut off and is screaming for a cellar hole to be there. Plus there is a road or path(PURPLE) leading to a dead stop. I would think there was a barn or house at the end of the little road. I would start my search for it inside the PINK area. But there is also that spot up at the top, on the right side of the road.(PINK BOX) that I bet is a partially filled in cellar hole.
Screenshot (136).jpg



where it gets tricky is the older ones or ones that have been partially or mostly filled in. Like the one in YELLOW below is a 1700's house site, that is in rough shape. Mostly filled in, none of the rocks from foundation are visible on site. But from its location and depression on lidar, it was enough for me to investigate further. Im glad i did it gave me 2 Firsts and turned out to be Colonial. The RED one is an 1800's foundation but has mostly collapsed. So sometimes the best house sites start as tiny depressions on lidar. Its up to you to march your butt out there and confirm.
Screenshot (126).jpg


Ok that otta do it for now. Merry Christmas 🎅
 

Wow! That is way more info than I was hoping for -- thank you SO MUCH, @DownEast_Detecting ! I owe you a beer or three (or whatever your beverage of choice may be)!

I'm not sure what to say about the images I posted -- I put them in as thumbnails in the post, but clicking them should have brought up full size images. On my computer, they do -- roughly 2500 x 1800 pixels. Maybe this is because I uploaded PNG instead of JPG? I will try again below. (But honestly they still look like crap compared to yours. I'm guessing this is just the lower resolution of the USGS 3DEP Lidar data vs the Maine LIDAR data?)

Your explanations and illustrations are great -- very easy to see and understand. Even here, though, experience counts. I would have never seen the colonial spot in the last image. I would have just thought it was "noise".

The explanation about the trees pushing up around the roots makes sense. And comparing the trees in my images vs the actual structural features in yours, it's easy to see the difference.

Thanks for marking the spots of interest on my thumbnail (again, sorry about the size, though I'm really not sure why it came out like that). I'm not sure what's in the two yellow rectangles, or the red circle, so I will check them out. The purple I think is one of the cedar trees. The blue is probably a retaining wall (modern) because the yard changes elevation there. And the green is the odd rectangular hook I mentioned. That's right under two big cedar trees. I can't see anything obvious there in person, but it's hard to get in among the branches.

Here are the two images again, as well as one with markup. I'll post as "full size" this time and as JPG, maybe that will work better? On the marked one, the green rectangle is the silver maple grove where the building (presumably a house) probably was. The blue ovals are all cedar tree "bumps". The red ovals are the privy and cellar holes (cellar is the larger one, probably a root cellar rather than a "basement", as most old houses here had separate root cellars). Then the brown oval marks the unknown rectangular "thing". Again, nothing obvious standing on the ground at that location, and it is between two cedar trees.

satellite.jpg


lidar.jpg


lidarmarked.jpg
 

(But honestly they still look like crap compared to yours. I'm guessing this is just the lower resolution of the USGS 3DEP Lidar data vs the Maine LIDAR data?)
The pictures were better this time. Bigger but still kind of pixelated. What does the little distance scale say in the lower left? Are you zoomed at more than 300ft. I never go that far in unless im trying to direct my self to a site out in the wild on my cell phone and im close to it. I usually scan areas at 600ft then if i see something interesting i go to 300ft for a closer look. All the above images i posted were using the USGS 3DEP Layer only. So it should be the same data we are accessing.
Thanks for marking the spots of interest on my thumbnail (again, sorry about the size, though I'm really not sure why it came out like that). I'm not sure what's in the two yellow rectangles, or the red circle, so I will check them out. The purple I think is one of the cedar trees. The blue is probably a retaining wall (modern) because the yard changes elevation there. And the green is the odd rectangular hook I mentioned. That's right under two big cedar trees. I can't see anything obvious there in person, but it's hard to get in among the branches.
Again there is nothing here that would make me stop and mark it as a site i would visit or look more into. Honestly it looks like from the satellite view that it has been landscaped fairly recently. Which would make lidar of the area useless.
Here are the two images again, as well as one with markup. I'll post as "full size" this time and as JPG, maybe that will work better? On the marked one, the green rectangle is the silver maple grove where the building (presumably a house) probably was. The blue ovals are all cedar tree "bumps". The red ovals are the privy and cellar holes (cellar is the larger one, probably a root cellar rather than a "basement", as most old houses here had separate root cellars). Then the brown oval marks the unknown rectangular "thing". Again, nothing obvious standing on the ground at that location, and it is between two cedar trees.
Its not about how you post it. You can take up the thole screen or shrink it to a thumbnail. Its the size of the .jpeg's you upload. This time there were way better. đź‘Ť
Yes BLUE tree bumps. Maybe even recent landscaping care for the tree? You know how you see those volcanoes of dirt or mulch around the tree.
So you already know where the cellar holes are? REDS? You shouldn't need the lidar anymore if you do.
BROWN thing, you keep saying you have gone out there and havent noticed anything. What are you looking for? have you brought out your metal detector? the area doesnt look very big so why dont you just scan with you detector, than you will know if there is anything there.


Again nothing would say this place looks old to me, so i wouldnt be searching the lidar for stuff.
The REDS are depressions. The two right next to each other at the bottom. Or almost identical. they might be man made landscapes. The blues are just 2 anomalies i picked out sense you asked me to look at it. Another thing that can happen is the landscape can change. This place looks like someones house or park or back yard. So they could of had landscaping done that changed the whole layout. i think the lidar scans can be a few years old. So Its like looking at google earth and seeing your old car in your parking lot.
Inkedlidar.jpg


If you have an old topo map that says there is an old building here. Why not just metal detect the whole area until you find stuff. Or find a concentration of iron, then fan out from there. As you probably found the old building site.
 

Honestly it looks like from the satellite view that it has been landscaped fairly recently. Which would make lidar of the area useless.
I guess that's possible. It's actually my front yard (home of the Mystery House Journal). It hasn't had any work done to it in the last ten years for sure, and knowing the state it was in when we bought it, I doubt there had been anything done for at least another ten years before that. I've got aerial photos going back to 1953, and just to compare the photos over the years, I don't think anything has been done to the ground out there since then either. We do mow the grass, but that's it. The previous owners didn't mow hardly any of that area, just a few feet either side of the driveway loop.

So you already know where the cellar holes are? REDS? You shouldn't need the lidar anymore if you do.
Yes. Found by accident by metal detecting finds and then deduction. The cellar hole actually does have a slightly depressed area in the ground that you can see standing there, but it's not visible on the LIDAR (or the satellite).

BROWN thing, you keep saying you have gone out there and havent noticed anything. What are you looking for? have you brought out your metal detector? the area doesnt look very big so why dont you just scan with you detector, than you will know if there is anything there.
I have scanned the part that's easily reachable between the two cedar trees, and found a couple of shotshell headstamps and a small calibre bullet. Not nearly as much iron as further out in the yard.

I'll be checking the spots you suggest with the metal detector later today. I walked out to the easternmost red circle yesterday and there most definitely is a two foot round hole there which I was not aware of (it's just past where we mow, so covered in tall grass).

If you have an old topo map that says there is an old building here. Why not just metal detect the whole area until you find stuff. Or find a concentration of iron, then fan out from there. As you probably found the old building site.
Oh I have. There's iron everywhere out there. My detector is constantly chattering because there is so much stuff in the ground. It's hard to say with any certainty where the building actually was because there doesn't really seem to be a "concentration" spot. It's all just all over the place. My interest in the LIDAR is not as much to find the place, but to understand it better, and get more of a "scope" of it. I know where the cellar (presumably root cellar) was, and I know where a hole is that was probably the privy. But I don't know for sure where the building was, whether there were any outbuildings, or how big their "yard" was. I also think it's useful to compare the LIDAR to the satellite and to what I see standing on the ground. Hopefully I can learn to read the signs better on I place I can compare to reality, so that I can use these tools to explore sites that aren't so easy for me to verify. And plus since this site is literally in my front yard, I am more interested in deeply understanding it than I might be for other sites that weren't so close to home.
 

oh i didnt realize this was your property. But i get what you are trying to do with teaching yourself what to look for. But since these cellar holes have been filled in. I would pick a site that you know of, where there are old cellar holes that are exposed and not filled in. Then you will get a better idea of what to be looking for.
If there were 2 cellar holes here on your property and a topo map showing a building. (I would assume the cellar holes are from the building on topo.) I would just search your entire property with the metal detector, doesnt look to big. But if it is, just grid off a section at a time and search that block thoroughly. I always have better luck finding stuff in the surrounding areas of cellar holes, if they are somewhat close to civilization. People will always use the hole as a dump and fill it with iron and tin cans. Makes it almost impossible to detect in it or next to it. But if you find a cellar hole in the middle of the woods, far from any roads or trails, thats different. Then i usually do have luck inside and close by the cellar hole.
 

I would just search your entire property with the metal detector, doesnt look to big.
Will do — at least that part of it. The entire property is quite a bit larger, but I don’t know of any buildings on it other than the one. There used to be a one room schoolhouse across the street so I intend to search the area near the road there too but haven’t gotten there yet. There are supposed to be several abandoned or lost towns not haw away — that’s my long term goal with understanding the LIDAR, to be able to figure out where those were. That’s part of what I love about this hobby — there’s so much to learn!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top