There would not be a proof mark on a side-plate. Those are on the barrel. The sideplate would have contractor and pattern marks. The Tower farmed out a lot of work to "cottage" producers. The broadarrow is British military property, the "H" probably designates the contractor and the "3" would be the pattern/mold that was used to produce the part. If they weren't fitting properly they'd know to change or replace mold three. It's a pain in the butt aligning the tapped & threaded holes in the lockplate with the holes in the stock and having them end up in line with the holes in the sideplate when it comes time to assemble the musket. And the shape of the sideplate has to fit the mortise cut by the stockmaker for it to drop into.
The British used a Pattern Room. They kept formally accepted examples of arms and parts, and gauges and jigs, that contractors could borrow for measurements.
Hi Charlie, I couldn't resist requesting your opinion of a piece of brass I found in my earlier days of digging since you are knowledgeable of markings. The item came out of an area where a lot of pewter buttons including a 71st, 52nd, and an RP were dug. This item is 7/8 of inch at it's widest. It is 1/8 inch thick and has a slight curve in it's design. I always assumed it was a part of some weapon but was not sure of the type. As seen, it has an arrow pointing to the right, then a D, then an arrow pointing down, then an S, then an arrow pointing left. Below the design looks like a four leaf flower. You recognize any of these markings?View attachment 1114959
It's the top of a musket escutcheon. Most are not marked so anything that is, is interesting.
I got a brown bess sideplate with the broad arrow too. But mine got an I instead of an H. I would love to know what it means.
View attachment 1241113