Museums to close exhibits featuring Native American artifacts, as new federal regulations take effect

dognose

Silver Member
Apr 15, 2009
3,526
9,835
Indiana
Detector(s) used
Fisher F70
CNN Fri January 26, 2024

The American Museum of Natural History in New York and other museums across the United States are closing or adapting exhibits featuring Native American objects, in response to new regulations from the Biden administration.

The regulations, which went into effect on January 12, require museums and federal agencies to consult and obtain informed consent from descendants, tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations before displaying or researching human remains or cultural items, according to the Department of the Interior.
cnn.jpg
The rules aim to provide updated guidelines for the implementation of the 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act – or NAGPRA – a federal law requiring the identification and repatriation of Indigenous remains. The goal is to speed up the process of returning Native American remains, objects of cultural patrimony, funerary objects and other sacred items to tribes, the Department of the Interior said.

The exhibits include large objects such as an Iroquois longhouse and a model of a Menominee birchbark canoe in the Hall of East Woodlands, according to the museum’s website.

Sean Decatur, president of the museum, told staff in a letter obtained by CNN that the Eastern Woodlands and Great Plains Halls will be closing because they contain a significant number of artifacts that, under the new regulations, could require consent to exhibit.

“The number of cultural objects on display in these Halls is significant, and because these exhibits are also severely outdated, we have decided that rather than just covering or removing specific items, we will close the Halls,” Decatur wrote in the letter.

He also acknowledged that the Halls and exhibits ”are vestiges of an era when museums such as ours did not respect the values, perspectives, and indeed shared humanity of Indigenous peoples.”


“While the actions we are taking this week may seem sudden, they reflect a growing urgency among all museums to change their relationships to, and representation of, Indigenous cultures.”

Earlier this month, the Field Museum in Chicago said in a statement that it had covered some cases displaying items from Indigenous communities across the United States in response to the new regulations and pending consultation with the communities represented in the museum’s collections.

The National Park Service maintains a database of Native American human remains and associated funerary objects that institutions have reported to the federal government under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.

While the Field Museum said it does not have human remains on display, the database shows the museum’s collection has nearly 1,300 human remains and 964 burial objects.

Last week, the Denver Art Museum said it removed a case with Mississippian/Caddoan ceramics from its galleries “out of an abundance of caution” but had no concerns about its current displays as the museum has followed NAGPRA since its launch.

John Lukavic and Dakota Hoska, two of the museum’s curators, explained in a statement that more than 30 tribes currently claim descent from the Caddoan Mississippian culture and they were notified about the ceramics but not all chose to conduct consultations.

“While the museum doesn’t believe that displaying these items puts its galleries out of compliance with new NAGPRA guidelines, we are reaching out to these communities to give them another opportunity to voice any concerns before displaying these items again,” Lukavic and Hoska wrote.

Some display cases at the Cleveland Museum of Art have been covered as staffers secure consent or confirm whether it was previously given to the museum, Todd Mesek, a spokesman for the museum told CNN on Friday.

“In some instances, we may already have permissions based on historical discussions with Native American representatives. We’re reviewing archival records to determine if consent consistent with the regulations has been obtained and, in instances where there is no record of consent, determine which parties need to be consulted,” Mesek told CNN.


In response to the regulations, the American Museum of Natural History said it will be closing two halls that featured Native American objects on January 27.

When Interior Secretary Deb Haaland announced the new regulations last month, she described the changes as “an important part of laying the groundwork for the healing of our people” in a written statement.

Haaland is the first Native American to hold a US cabinet position.

“The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act is an essential tool for the safe return of sacred objects to the communities from which they were stolen. Among the updates we are implementing are critical steps to strengthen the authority and role of Indigenous communities in the repatriation process,” Haaland said.

In addition to streamlining the repatriation process and requiring informed consent, the new regulations will also require museums and federal agencies to consult and update inventories of human remains and associated funeral objects within five years.

SOURCE
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/26/us/m...ew-federal-regulations-take-effect/index.html
 

Upvote 4
Even a "Model" of a "Menominee" Birch bark canoe needs permission?, a MODEL? I worked with a fella years ago that could make arrowheads by hand the traditional way, beautiful work he did. I suppose now that would be wrong, only because he was a Polish guy. Just a thought, but could? this new law be just a little racist? What about objects from European culture, (German, French, Italian etc.) or Asian culture, South American, East Indian, British, Irish, Scotch? Since a "Model" is off limits now, how about clothing? WHO do we, (all of us) get permission from. Every artifact throughout the world must be returned, and every museum closed. Or is this only in the United States. Would not surprise me, not at all. Come Saint Patrick's Day, damn well better get permission to wear "The Green", otherwise, that could be considered "Cultural theft". Yep, another thing that anyone can run with, about anything anywhere. Gives me a headache.
 

Blackfoot58, please keep politics out of posts per our rules, the only forum it is allowed in is our politics forum.
 

It makes you think about artifact shows, how soon will those be banned?
Oh it wont be long, and imo they'll want artifacts given back, I look for the outlaw of collecting and finding artifacts also. do to cultural reasons,Some states already want you to report artifcats you find if what they say are burial items...
 

Oh it wont be long, and imo they'll want artifacts given back, I look for the outlaw of collecting and finding artifacts also. do to cultural reasons,Some states already want you to report artifcats you find if what they say are burial items...
NAGPRA requires institutions to give back artifacts (except for the Smithsonian), but you're probably right soon they'll want items from personal collections...
 

Blackfoot58, please keep politics out of posts per our rules, the only forum it is allowed in is our politics forum.
Sorry, I didn’t check to see what forum it was under. The opening post mentions the Biden Administration. I should check the forum and not assume it’s a political post. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.👍🏼
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2606.jpeg
    IMG_2606.jpeg
    47.9 KB · Views: 17
Sorry, I didn’t check to see what forum it was under. The opening post mentions the Biden Administration. I should check the forum and not assume it’s a political post. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.👍🏼
Thank you for understanding.
 

The NAGPRA law hasn't changed since it passed in 1990.

Important point: NAGPRA ownership only applies to Native American cultural items which are excavated or discovered on Federal or tribal lands after November 16, 1990.

The subsequent NAGPRA requirement for identification, investigation and notice of origin of cultural items applies only to federal institutions and museums that accept federal funds.

The review, listing and notice of possession of cultural items was supposed to be completed by 1995. Throughout each year many inventory completion and repatriation notices are filed into the Federal Register but in December/early January there is a always rush of notices. I haven't noticed that this year is any different than in past years.

The "regulation" to prohibit showing unlisted items is nowhere to be found in NAGPRA. It's entirely the creation of the current administration.

Federal agencies and museums are not required or able to return these objects unless they receive a "request of a known lineal descendant of the Native American or of the tribe or organization". If they don't receive the request they can not return the items. Native tribes are allowed to refuse to accept returns as well in NAGPRA.

Both these situations, that are envisioned in NAGPRA, are in opposition to the administration's new "regulation". Remember that ownership of these items excavated or discovered on federal lands before November 16, 1990 is not with the native tribes until the "request of a known lineal descendant of the Native American or of the tribe or organization". In these situations the items belong to the common law owner of the items - usually the museum. Essentially this regulation takes away the ownership rights in the item that was specifically allowed in the law - particularly since museums are in the business of displaying these objects to the public.

Interestingly both museums and many native tribes objected to this rule change because it's going to cost more money and take more time to accomplish the same goals. It does increase the size and influence of government regulation. Maybe that was the goal?
 

Where's the political forum? i scrolled through 3 times couldnt find it, figured it would be a hoot to read...
It is found under the Charter Member Forum, only visible to CM...

CM is $20 a year, gives members the ability to sell and post links to their EBay sales as well. Owners insisted politics forum only be visible to paying charter members.
 

It is found under the Charter Member Forum, only visible to CM...

CM is $20 a year, gives members the ability to sell and post links to their EBay sales as well. Owners insisted politics forum only be visible to paying charter members.
Copy ,thanks for the reply...
 

Seeking honest opinions from artifact experts…Are they or are they not???🤔
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0631.jpeg
    IMG_0631.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 18
Technically the one in the middle is, two on the right no, and top and left look at best flakes. But you’ll be better off with your own thread and a few more pictures.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top