More strange Virginia artifacts.

I can't really see enough from those pics to tell if they have been worked.

Joel
 

Looks like debries to me. After hunting up in NC/VA for 3 years, I used to come accross that type of stuff all the time. I doubt they are cresents, they show lots of flaking (percussion marks ) on both sides.
Still where there is debrie there will be at least blades/tools..

Molly.
 

Thanks for the response and info Jeff. I live a few miles north of the Thunderbird and Fifty sites in N.W. Virginia. My friends have found Paleo points in the area, but not me..... not yet. Our property has a high scraper to point ratio. Here are a few points from the property, hard to I.D. being broken and worn out, I think they might be Archaic.
Thanks again for your response,
Viking.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_3280 (800x532).jpg
    DSC_3280 (800x532).jpg
    101.8 KB · Views: 790
  • DSC_3283 (800x532).jpg
    DSC_3283 (800x532).jpg
    83.8 KB · Views: 778
A high ratio of flake Scrapers to points is a good thing.............it just means the points have not been found yet................
I'am sure I have more good Flake Scrapers,................then points on some sites
 

theviking said:
Thanks for the info Molly, great point on your avatar :notworthy:

Viking.

Thanks Viking. It's a "Frileys" found on the "trail of tears" in Texas..It's one of my prized points. Love Caddo points...

Molly.
 

In my opinion (since you're asking for opinions) (and to the extent that anybody cares) your friend the archaeologist is very probably right.

That pieces similar to these can be found elsewhere, perhaps in other time frames, is pretty close to irrelevant to what these particular artifacts were in the archaeological history of YOUR locale. Seeing as he wouldn't have ID'd them as scrapers without there being parallel examples from excavated contexts and unless they showed edge wear diagnostic of scraper use, there you have it.
 

uniface said:
In my opinion (since you're asking for opinions) (and to the extent that anybody cares) your friend the archaeologist is very probably right.

That pieces similar to these can be found elsewhere, perhaps in other time frames, is pretty close to irrelevant to what these particular artifacts were in the archaeological history of YOUR locale. Seeing as he wouldn't have ID'd them as scrapers without there being parallel examples from excavated contexts and unless they showed edge wear diagnostic of scraper use, there you have it uote]
Thanks for your thoughts, I have allways apriciated your opinion and comments. Keep up the good work.
HH Viking.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top