Meteorites ore what ? stone unalised but ....

Aoolfman1st

Jr. Member
Aug 30, 2019
43
44
Lebanon
Detector(s) used
Okm
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • IMG-20201203-WA0485.jpg
    IMG-20201203-WA0485.jpg
    114.3 KB · Views: 56
  • IMG-20201203-WA0483.jpg
    IMG-20201203-WA0483.jpg
    138.5 KB · Views: 51
  • IMG-20201203-WA0484.jpg
    IMG-20201203-WA0484.jpg
    116.5 KB · Views: 47
  • IMG-20201203-WA0572.jpg
    IMG-20201203-WA0572.jpg
    60.4 KB · Views: 55
Just to add a bit more. The analytical report doesn't include details of sample preparation but one assumes its a bulk analysis from a sample representative of the overall composition. That would make sense since the results are quoted in ppm (=mg/kg) and if you divide by 10,000 you get a percentage; the total of all the values then gives pretty much 100%.

So, what it shows is that the sample analysed at 97.16% iron with 0.93% manganese and lesser amounts of other metals. The levels of the non-ferrous metals are not consistent with the composition of any class of meteorites. Nickel is also conspicuously absent, which would never be the case for a meteorite with that amount of iron since the two metals always occur together in meteorites with iron predominating.

If that is a full bulk analysis then what you have is not a natural 'rock' since the report only shows the presence of metals, but none of the other elements that would be expected in rock samples. No silicon is reported for example. It would have to be something man-made. Depending on how the sample was prepared, the results might be reported as percentages of the metallic portion of the specimen only, in which case it could be a rock but still not a meteoritic rock.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top