Kerry Signs UN Treaty, Says It Wont Harm US Rights.......

pat-tekker-cat

Gold Member
Feb 23, 2011
6,335
8,488
S. Fl.
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Minelab Excal II, Garrett, Tesoro
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Well the undertaker is a huge liar. And he is very adept at it. Knowing this you should realize that we are now in deep DOO.
 

A treaty must be ratified by senate or it isn't in effect.

The constitutional requirement is that the Senate approve a treaty with a two-thirds vote, not a majority but 2/3s. That means 66 senators must agree, successful treaties must gain support that overcomes partisan division.

Dem would need 14 rep votes to ratify the treaty. We need to let all them know we will not tolerate its passage.

This is the same as ob trying to start a war with Syria.

They are once again trying to circumvent our Constitution, they have no respect for our Constitution at all...








Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

i truely believe that we are witnessing history in the making, i for one am prepared to act on behalf of all those who came before me ,for two hundred plus years americans have fought and died to protect my rights, i cant sit idle and watch them destroy our constitution,our rights, but one man camping out in washington is a nut job, but 50 million shuting down the city with a single voice,is a peacful movement that cant be ignored! theres about to be a tremor felt , it will be all those fine men and women buried in arlington rolling over in there graves.
 

all this does is increase profits in the Underground arms trade Business.

Prices just went up due to increased risk :laughing7:
 

i truely believe that we are witnessing history in the making, i for one am prepared to act on behalf of all those who came before me ,for two hundred plus years americans have fought and died to protect my rights, i cant sit idle and watch them destroy our constitution,our rights, but one man camping out in washington is a nut job, but 50 million shuting down the city with a single voice,is a peacful movement that cant be ignored! theres about to be a tremor felt , it will be all those fine men and women buried in arlington rolling over in there graves.

Oct 11-13 is a chance to express your displeasure. There is a trucker strike scheduled, they plan on descending on DC just like the bikers did in protest only this time it will be with millions of trucks, many with trailors. I plan on supporting it.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

Last edited:
IT IS IN DIRECT VOLATION OF OUR "2ND ADMENDMENT RIGHTS " SINCE IT INFRINGES UPON GUN OWNERSHIP RIGHTS ---AND AS SUCH SHOULD HAVE NOT BEEN SIGNED OR AGREED TO BY ANY MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN GOVT --WHO TAKES AN OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AS PART OF THEIR TAKING "OFFICE".
 

IT IS IN DIRECT VOLATION OF OUR "2ND ADMENDMENT RIGHTS " SINCE IT INFRINGES UPON GUN OWNERSHIP RIGHTS ---AND AS SUCH SHOULD HAVE NOT BEEN SIGNED OR AGREED TO BY ANY MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN GOVT --WHO TAKES AN OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AS PART OF THEIR TAKING "OFFICE".

As usual, Point on Ivan!

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

I'm a little surprised and shocked, more ppl are not raising cane, over this!
We have elected officials trying to circumvent our constitution. Period!
Many would call that treason!
Does Americans NOT SEE, there are those in DC, willing to sell your children, g-children, and great-g-children, down the river into, basically, slavery! AND FOR WHAT!? Corporate profits? World domination? Power, greed?
I'm sorry, I just DO NOT believe, Kerry and his big o, has MY (or America's) best interest at heart!
 

“Small arms” essentially just means guns protected by the Second Amendment.

The purpose of the treaty is simple: to give old BO and the other liberals a legal excuse to start violating gun rights through more gun control.

That’s it. Still, no matter what they do, it’s always going to be unconstitutional...

Amendment II
..........The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"

Anyone trying to trample on ANY of our rights GUARANTEED to us in our Constitution is a traitor to the Constitution...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

Last edited:
“Small arms” essentially just means guns protected by the Second Amendment.

The purpose of the treaty is simple: to give old BO and the other liberals a legal excuse to start violating gun rights through more gun control.

That’s it. Still, no matter what they do, it’s always going to be unconstitutional...

Amendment II
..........The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"

Anyone trying to trample on ANY of our rights GUARANTEED to us in our Constitution is a traitor to the Constitution...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2



There are master metal-smiths, working in caves, around the world, with primitive ovens, and make some of the best guns in the world. Think they care about this UN treaty!?
 

Last edited:
Let's see, does this mean Holder can't transfer any more arms to the drug cartels in Mexico and Obama shouldn't send arms to Al Qaeda in Syria?? If I were Kerry I would have resigned my position and refused to sign having sworn to uphold the Constitution. He's a traitorous basta$d in my eyes along with the rest of Obama's cronies. I have a very humble home and would probably be considered a serf in feudal times but the king and his court are not welcome in it.
 

What will our government do when the UN wants to control speech, religion and freedom of the press? There is already talk about making it a crime to say anything bad about the Muslims. When I worked for the federal government we had to take mandatory training including "Diversity in the Workplace". In that training we were told that we should accept all kinds of different type folks and treat EVERYONE as EQUALS!! But, get this, they added that, we should pay SPECIAL ATTENTION to the SENSITIVITIES of anyone known to be or could be suspected of being of Arab decent. How is THAT equal? Sorry prez but, given the facts and actions of those thought to be "friendlys" anyone I now consider being of Arab decent is on my suspect list. That's just the way it is. That list consists of a lot of people in government positions as well. Our country has gone downhill so fast it's not funny. We will soon be a 3rd world country by choice.
 

What will our government do when the UN wants to control speech, religion and freedom of the press? There is already talk about making it a crime to say anything bad about the Muslims. When I worked for the federal government we had to take mandatory training including "Diversity in the Workplace". In that training we were told that we should accept all kinds of different type folks and treat EVERYONE as EQUALS!! But, get this, they added that, we should pay SPECIAL ATTENTION to the SENSITIVITIES of anyone known to be or could be suspected of being of Arab decent. How is THAT equal? Sorry prez but, given the facts and actions of those thought to be "friendlys" anyone I now consider being of Arab decent is on my suspect list. That's just the way it is. That list consists of a lot of people in government positions as well. Our country has gone downhill so fast it's not funny. We will soon be a 3rd world country by choice.


I agree we should treat every single person as Equal to us,
at least until that person proves they are below us.

But I don't agree with treating anyone as if they are above us.
 

On the one website link above, they did gather over 2000 signatures in a 24 hour period. I do hope we have other sites and other avenues, that collected some/more also.

I'm also surprised there is not a NY ticker tape parade for Mr. K's, uhhhh, heroic signature. Not even media or press coverage. If it was something him and the big o are so proud of, why are they not shouting it from the rooftops?
 

Last edited:
I may feel low, powerless that resistance is futile. That being said I have and will always stand for truth and justice, Liberty and Freedom God and Country.
We cannot let the blood spilled in defense of our freedoms be for nothing, drift into the past meaningless and all but forgotten.
How many eons has mankind been under the thumb of our benevolent leaders? For one brief moment we stood up and declared that "we hold these truths to be self
evident...." And gave power to the people. Do we now turn our backs on the pages of history? I dare say to turn our backs on our past we shall revisit a more
distant and sickening era which in turn would be our present and grim future.

But all is not lost, we have some who speak for us, fighting the good fight. And even more we have article V of the constitution. It is time to examine the
second part of article V before we cross the rubicon and only have violence to fall back on.

Mark Levin Show - The Liberty Amendments #1 Non-Fiction For Three Straight Weeks!

 

Let's see, does this mean Holder can't transfer any more arms to the drug cartels in Mexico and Obama shouldn't send arms to Al Qaeda in Syria?? If I were Kerry I would have resigned my position and refused to sign having sworn to uphold the Constitution. He's a traitorous basta$d in my eyes along with the rest of Obama's cronies. I have a very humble home and would probably be considered a serf in feudal times but the king and his court are not welcome in it.

Kerry has been a traitor all his life! Even to his first wife, which didnt have enough money!!!!
He spent 5 months in Nam, and signed his own papers to get medals. Faked a wound to get out of there as fast as he could. Called every nam-vet 'baby killers'. (and, admits to doing it himself!) I heard a rumor that he killed his mom to get her money early! :laughing7:
 

bevo, that was poetic man,couldnt ask for it to be said any better,lets just hope that people see that there are americans who still believe in how and why our country was founded, and to disregard rights as arbitrary rules to be changed to suit whimsical ideas of the day,is arrogance in its purest form!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top