D
DeepThought
Guest
I had the opportunity to try a Whites DI-6000 SL Pro a couple of weeks ago. Observations:
> the Whites had far more features and quality....but was also a LOT heavier....and noisier than my cheap Tracker IV
> the VID accuracy was pretty accurate at the surface, but rapidly fell off at the 3" depth mark
> depth was about 6" in discriminate and roughly another inch in threshold.
> it took some time (and I just scratched the surface) to begin to understand when I was over a target. I.e. no tone ID
> the control layout required a two handed approach to manipulating discrimination, etc...
...clearly, a better built machine but I began to ask myself whether it outperformed my Tracker IV, in my humble hands for what I assume are equally humble needs. In short, I could do what I needed done, faster and easier with the Tracker (granted,familiarity is part of it). My point is I began to ask myself whether the cost differential was worth it.....and keep coming back to beep & dig if I really want to know what is going on.
DT
> the Whites had far more features and quality....but was also a LOT heavier....and noisier than my cheap Tracker IV
> the VID accuracy was pretty accurate at the surface, but rapidly fell off at the 3" depth mark
> depth was about 6" in discriminate and roughly another inch in threshold.
> it took some time (and I just scratched the surface) to begin to understand when I was over a target. I.e. no tone ID
> the control layout required a two handed approach to manipulating discrimination, etc...
...clearly, a better built machine but I began to ask myself whether it outperformed my Tracker IV, in my humble hands for what I assume are equally humble needs. In short, I could do what I needed done, faster and easier with the Tracker (granted,familiarity is part of it). My point is I began to ask myself whether the cost differential was worth it.....and keep coming back to beep & dig if I really want to know what is going on.
DT
Upvote
0