Is this what I think it is? One the fence

Sep 18, 2011
338
175

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    232.4 KB · Views: 130
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    204.6 KB · Views: 132
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    210 KB · Views: 119
Upvote 0
Are you thinking that it could be a Native American-made gun flint? I've never tried chert of that color in my flintlock, but that would be a good "cabin fever" experiment to conduct!
 

Hmmmm-Certainly not for a gun. I think it is a scraper but wanted to get a 2nd opinion.
It looks a but different burlington chert but I could be wrong.
 

Let me ask this of the group-does this look like chert? It's quite dull with limited percussion ripples. Any idea how it would be made?
Thanks
 

I'm not familiar with lithics from your area. But it certainly was flaked into shape. In my own region, chert is very much a minority lithic. Instead I find flaked artifacts made of quartz, quartzite, argillite, rhyolite, felsite, hornfels, etc. All those lithics would be considered of poorer quality to most cherts/flints/jaspers. But what you are showing certainly seems to be a bifacially flaked artifact. I would not get too hung up on the fact that it might not be chert. I don't know what the material actually is, but it certainly looks artifactual from here......
 

Might have been heat treated.
 

Definitely bi-faced. Nice thin profile in that last pic too. The color looks to be an add-on but I don't know what material it could be made from. The piece itself, probably chert.
 

Like the others have said it is an artifact. The type of stone can cover a large area, it could be made from the cortex of a stone from your area.
 

Small scraper, not all scrappers or artifacts are finely flaked...
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top