Interesting Read: How Did Humans Boil Water Before the Invention of Pots?

dognose

Silver Member
Apr 15, 2009
3,521
9,824
Indiana
Detector(s) used
Fisher F70
How Did Humans Boil Water Before the Invention of Pots?


SARAH ZHANG
JANUARY 16, 2020


Roasting would have been easy. But re-creating the paleo way of boiling water requires a bit more imagination.
atlantic1.jpg


On a blustery day in October, Andrew Langley and 13 other graduate students headed to the woods to learn to boil water. They were allowed no obvious cooking vessels: no pots, no pans, no bowls, no cups, no containers at all. But they did bring deer hides, which Langley had carefully procured from deer farms. They were to boil water the Paleolithic way.


Langley is a doctoral student in archaeology at the University of York, and he studies how prehistoric humans cooked without pottery. Ceramics are a relatively recent invention in the long arc of human history. Pottery shards appear in the archaeological record only 20,000 years ago, first in China and then many millennia later in the Near East and Europe. Metal cookware is an even more recent innovation. For tens or even hundreds of thousands of years before all this, our ancestors were building fires and using heat to make food tastier, safer, and easier to digest. The invention of cooking, anthropologists have argued, helped make humans human.


Itā€™s easy to imagine how prehistoric people could have roasted their food. Itā€™s much harder to imagine how they could have boiled it without pottery. But thatā€™s what Langley, who was helping lead a class of masterā€™s students in archaeology, set out to attempt that October morning. Their boiling experiment was part of a course, and it took place at the York Experimental Archaeological Research Centre, a lakeside grove where researchers try to re-create the prehistoric by hafting arrowheads and weaving baskets out of reedsā€“and, in this case, boiling water. The students divided into groups of two or three, and they set out on this extremely simple yet daunting task.


A couple of groups dug pits, filling them with coals and then lining them with either wet clay or a deer hide. Others poured water into birch bark or pig stomachs (procured from a Chinese supermarket). One group hung a deer hide from a tree and started heating small rocks in a fireā€“a technique inspired by the discovery of fire-cracked rocks in Paleolithic sites. These rocks had split and changed in distinct ways that suggested repeated heating and cooling. Archaeologists think that these stones were heated in fires and then dropped into water for cooking.


But you canā€™t use just any old rocks for boiling. ā€œThe stones are the most tricky part,ā€ Langley says. Wet stones, such as those that have been sitting in a river bed, will explode when the water inside turns into steam. So will stones with air trapped inside them. ā€œThings like granite and basalt are very good,ā€ he says. For safety reasons, Langley provided the students were provided with massage stones that he knew would not explode. Still, the students had to heat the stones gradually to make sure that they did not crack at all. They ended up slowly nudging the stones into the fire over the course of 10 to 15 minutes. Using multiple stones, they were able to get the water inside the deer hide to boil.


Another group was also attempting to boil water inside a deer hide hung directly over a fireā€“a technique admittedly less grounded in physical evidence from archaeological sites. In 2015, John Speth, a retired anthropologist at the University of Michigan, wrote a paper pointing out that you can actually boil water in a plastic water bottle. The paper, he was happy to explain to me, was inspired by watching the reality show Survivorman, in which the outdoor expert Les Stroud boils water in a plastic bottle, with his son. Speth quickly found YouTube videos and other evidence of people heating water in paper cups, coconut shells, bamboo tubes, wooden bowls, and even leaves. It turns out that as long as the cooking container is filled with water, it does not get hot enough to ignite.


But when Speth began talking with other archaeologists about this, he found that they had rarely thought about Paleolithic humans boiling water this way, using seemingly flimsy and flammable containers long before the introduction of pottery. However, ethnographers in the 19th and 20 centuries documented the Celts, Assiniboin, Cree, Ojibwa, and Blackfeet cooking without stones in birch bark, hides, and animal stomachs. These organic materials would have rotted, of course, leaving no artifacts for archaeologists to study. Speth wondered if humans could have boiled liquids this way long before the evidence showed up in the archaeological record.




One group of students decided to put this method to the test. They hoisted their water-filled deer hide directly over a fire, and they planned to let it go as long as the hide stayed intact. The hair on the outside singed, but the skin itself held up just fine. So the students waited and waited and waited. Four hours later, the hide was still intact. It did get very hard, but neither sprung a leak nor burned.




The students tried to boil water in a deer hide directly over a fire. (YEAR Centre)
The water reached 60 degrees Celsius, or 140 degrees Fahrenheit, but it did not come to a boil. And the deer hide definitely added some extra flavor, if you will, to the water. ā€œIf you stuck your head over it while it was cooking, you could smell it,ā€ says Christopher Lance, one of the students. They were, I was disappointed to learn, not allowed to drink the hide-boiled water for food-safety reasons.


The students are now writing up the results of their different pot-less boiling techniques. And Speth was incredibly pleased to hear that a group of students decided to put his idea of wet cooking without hot stones to the test. Itā€™s extremely speculative, he admitted. But archaeology always has to deal with the problem of an incomplete record, and certain types of evidence (i.e., anything that will rot) are always going to be more incomplete than others. Itā€™s about considering the things we see and also the things we donā€™t see. ā€œIf nobody asked the question,ā€ Speth said, ā€œnobody would even think itā€™s worth thinking about.ā€




SOURCE:
TheAtlantic.com
https://www.theatlantic.com/science...ans-cook-before-the-invention-of-pots/605008/
 

Upvote 0
How do we know they even boiled water?

Thatā€™s the question! And furthermore, how would THEY have known what heating water would have done to help them to achieve something they hadnā€™t achieved before? They either accidentally learned it through some natural process that they saw happen or it was taught to them by someone. ā€œExperimentationā€ probably wasnā€™t very high on their list of things to do, I would imagine they were constantly worried about mere survival.
Excellent question...:notworthy:
 

I also donā€™t think boiling water was a real necessity for them.

Maybe not for the very earliest paleo people who were true nomadic hunter gatherers, but by the time people settled into territories and started to develop lifestyles based around a key resource like acorns, boiling techniques were required to process food. This was at least 7 thousand years ago in California and maybe a lot longer.
For the record, California acorn cultures never did develop a pottery industry and continued to use tightly woven baskets for both carrying water and boiling it.
 

It has traditionally been assumed that ā€˜boilingā€™ does not predate the appearance of ā€œFire-Cracked-Rocksā€ (FCRs) in the archaeological record, and was an early modern human innovation in the Upper Palaeolithic. The earliest evidence for FCRs that we have is from cave occupations which date to around 26,000 years and then the appearance of potentially fire-worthy pottery around 20,000 years ago. Even then, such pottery may not have been sufficiently robust to survive direct heating in in early times.

There are numerous reasons why boiling, as a technology, may have been advantageous to early humans. However, Neanderthals are increasingly being found not to have been inferior to humans in the technological skills department and there is some sketchy evidence that they may have been using boiling as early as 40,000 years ago (whether copied from other hominins or self-discovered) and for sure they had no fireworthy pottery.

The suggestion comes from the discovery of starch grains in cereals that had been wet-cooked found on the teeth of a Neanderthal skeleton in the Shanidar cave in Iraq. The circumstantial evidence is for the consumption of a porridge-like gruel that must have been heated at least close to boiling point. It canā€™t be completely ruled out that the grains came from some kind of unmilled drop-scone like mixture that was directly heated on a stone over a fire, rather than cooked with water in containers.

However, there is additional possible evidence that is widespread. Food-related bone remains from Neanderthal caves are generally remarkably free from rodent or scavenger-gnawing. It has been postulated that this is consistent with the carcass bones having been boiled to render the fat and remove every last scrap of connective tissue, in a way that dry roasting would not have achieved.

I have a number of FCRs used as pot-boiling stones from a later Neolithic site (c5,000 years BP) not far from where I live in the UK, like the one below. Repeated heating and plunging into water gives a very characteristic cracking and spalling effect. Theyā€™re sufficiently abundant in a particular location that there must have been some mass use over an extended period. It may not have been cooking as such. There are other possible uses such as dye extraction from plants, glue preparation from hoof & hide and so on.

Neolithic Pot-Boiler.jpg
 

Excellent thread and post. I have often found fire cracked rocks and points with fire pop. I think for sheer boredom the fire pit was a place many things ended up.When your whole world revolves around the strongest material being stone I think they pushed the limits. Boiling was probably an easy leap if for nothing more than curiosity and then becoming more.
 

Heat the rocks first then put them in the water. Either that or they lived by Yellowstone Park geysers.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top