im not really into fetishs............

[chong2]

im not really into fetish's............

found by a spring, kinda iffy, so opinions i gotta ask, looks like clay and has a crack down the back, and one of the front legs are broken off. pretty dang close if u ask me. sorry pics are horrible and is out of my hands at the moment...

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Diving for Pleasure and Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[Rege-PA]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

Chong2...Several things need answered, it does look like some amorphous animal, having two ears leads one to believe that it was formed by man and not naturally. Found by a spring associates it with a known prehistoric meeting area, any other signs, flint chips, pottery, points at the location? Is the clay same as that at the spring area? Any indents on the clay that might suggest it was molded or carved? These items are a gray area to the average collector, some tend to see these shapes in everything while others fail to notice definitely worked pieces.
For most collectors to believe it must have some evidence of being worked or found in a context with other items of know authenticity. The shape looks good, you just need to find some evidence that it was fashioned by man.

 

[Montana Jim]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

If authentic, which it looks like after seeing those pictures, I think that is about the coolest thing I've seen here!

 

[chong2]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

thanks guys, no no indentions that i can tell. no artifacts or evidence of prehistoric cultures at the exact place it was found, however there is a HUGE amount of prehistoric history in the area. very imediate area. ill take it by someone who may know, and maybe someone else, if they say yes, maybe a pay service can help more.

 

[seger98]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

That's a cool piece, I'd have it looked at!

 

[phantomfinder]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

It lookes sweet , did you have any one look at it...... . great find....

 

[burglarifyoulike]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

sure hope its the real thing- wow is that ever neat!!

 

[EDDE]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

8)

 

[chong2]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

na, have not gotten around to getting it checked out. soon tho, soon

 

[creekhunter]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

 

[chong2]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

well the more i hold it and look at it i think it is one. i will be sending it off next week. i will keep you posted. wish me good fortune

 

[Montana Jim]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

well the more i hold it and look at it i think it is one. i will be sending it off next week. i will keep you posted. wish me good fortune

Good luck!

 

[Neanderthal]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

looks like a limestone formation to me, they take on some very wicked shapes. A high percentage of the collections around here that I examine contain them.

 

[Hippy]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

It's a geofact. Simply something natural that looks to be the shape of an animal.

Hippy

 

[gilmerman]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

I like patent leather and nylons with garter belts.

 

[chong2]

Re: im not really into fetish's............

hey gilmerman, the post is npt YOUR fetish, lmao