If they tried taking our guns.

onfire

Silver Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2004
Messages
2,677
Reaction score
1,336
Golden Thread
0
Location
Wisconsin
Detector(s) used
250 2500
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I said if. Would that cause a vacuum for let's say Mexico drug cartel to supply us with more? How about Syria, Russia , or any of the other ones that want to see a take over from within. Or maybe the powers to be, know something. That we already have been infiltrated So instead of Racial profiling they just want every body's guns. Maybe that's why the borders are pores?

Almost all the threads are what we would do if they took them My Question is whats their agenda? Besides power trip. Or control.
 

Here is one thought. Say another country loaned us trillions of dollars and there was no way to pay it back? Would they want some sort of collateral if they saw that there was no effort to stop spending or borrowing? Think they would want to aquire natural resources and or farmland for themselves, essentially take over a country without a shot fired?

Maybe I look to the future too much by looking at the past, some say I am very illogical because I play with too much math I guess.

By the way here is something.
China Calls for 'No Delay' on Gun Controls in U.S. - NYTimes.com


Do you think some countries may be thinking of divvying up some goodies?
Does UN arms trade treaty figure in Obama administration?s gun control plans? | Fox News
 

Here's a thought - Suppose they took your guns....and just left you the hell alone? :o
 

I said if. Would that cause a vacuum for let's say Mexico drug cartel to supply us with more? How about Syria, Russia , or any of the other ones that want to see a take over from within. Or maybe the powers to be, know something. That we already have been infiltrated So instead of Racial profiling they just want every body's guns. Maybe that's why the borders are pores?

Almost all the threads are what we would do if they took them My Question is whats their agenda? Besides power trip. Or control.

When something is wrong in regards to a certain aspect of a vehicle's design... isn't there a recall due to the obvious flaw? Maybe the folks in the US should be able to do the same thing with the millions of guns that were freely distributed? The problem is that the price to buy them back will be double the original sale price. It's all supply and demand now eh? Prices going up on gun and ammo related items when the economy dictates that they should be going down?
 

Here's a thought - Suppose they took your guns....and just left you the hell alone? :o

Even better, suppose they just leave us alone period!
 

They've done that for 230 years. Hasn't worked out very well has it!
 

When something is wrong in regards to a certain aspect of a vehicle's design... isn't there a recall due to the obvious flaw? Maybe the folks in the US should be able to do the same thing with the millions of guns that were freely distributed? The problem is that the price to buy them back will be double the original sale price. It's all supply and demand now eh? Prices going up on gun and ammo related items when the economy dictates that they should be going down?
Very simple, MY GUNS AIN'T FOR SALE............
 

They've done that for 230 years. Hasn't worked out very well has it!

How has it not worked out well?? I mean its not like we have been having mass killings everyday across the US. If people want to kill someone they will guns or not. But with no guns the government can screw with us more, pass more stupid bills and try to do more stupid things since no one can fight back. There wouldn't been a USA with out guns. This is why we Americans love our guns so dearly and the constitution gives us that right for as long as this great country survives.
 

How has it not worked out well?? I mean its not like we have been having mass killings everyday across the US. If people want to kill someone they will guns or not. But with no guns the government can screw with us more, pass more stupid bills and try to do more stupid things since no one can fight back. There wouldn't been a USA with out guns. This is why we Americans love our guns so dearly and the constitution gives us that right for as long as this great country survives.

As FELON (in USA), you lose ALL Rights; as EX-FELON, HARD to get 'em back...
 

arnofarrell said:
How has it not worked out well?? I mean its not like we have been having mass killings everyday across the US. If people want to kill someone they will guns or not. But with no guns the government can screw with us more, pass more stupid bills and try to do more stupid things since no one can fight back. There wouldn't been a USA with out guns. This is why we Americans love our guns so dearly and the constitution gives us that right for as long as this great country survives.


"But with no guns the government can screw with us more, pass more stupid bills and try to do more stupid things since no one can fight back. ""

Really? What country have you been living in - no stupid bills?

And you believe that if a citizen does not like a bill that has been passed that they should take up arms against the government?

No offense but that kind if thinking is a fantastic advertisement for gun control!!
 

"But with no guns the government can screw with us more, pass more stupid bills and try to do more stupid things since no one can fight back. ""

Really? What country have you been living in - no stupid bills?

And you believe that if a citizen does not like a bill that has been passed that they should take up arms against the government?

No offense but that kind if thinking is a fantastic advertisement for gun control!!

VERY SCARY!
 

How has it not worked out well?? I mean its not like we have been having mass killings everyday across the US. If people want to kill someone they will guns or not. But with no guns the government can screw with us more, pass more stupid bills and try to do more stupid things since no one can fight back. There wouldn't been a USA with out guns. This is why we Americans love our guns so dearly and the constitution gives us that right for as long as this great country survives.

It's nothing more than an excuse, and a very poor one at that! Get real!
 

I do believe that the laws dealing with felons should be looked at again. The same thing goes with military members who get out with a dishonorable discharge and have the same laws like felons.

I am not sure what you ment when you rewrote "stupid bills?" Are you asking what bills in particular or are you saying there are and always will be stupid bills? By stupid bills I ment stuff that the majority of citizens do not want but it still becomes law.

I am not saying that I should jump to arms if a bill passes that I disagree with all I am saying is that the second amendment keeps them from taking away other freedoms and trying to control our lives.
 

"But with no guns the government can screw with us more, pass more stupid bills and try to do more stupid things since no one can fight back. ""

Really? What country have you been living in - no stupid bills?

And you believe that if a citizen does not like a bill that has been passed that they should take up arms against the government?

No offense but that kind if thinking is a fantastic advertisement for gun control!!
Um, where exactly did he say a citizen should take up arms against govt if they don't like a particular bill?
He didn't say "no stupid bills" he SAID "more stupid bills"
lets try not to just jump aboard someone because you want to stockpicker.....
 

I do believe that the laws dealing with felons should be looked at again. The same thing goes with military members who get out with a dishonorable discharge and have the same laws like felons.

I am not sure what you ment when you rewrote "stupid bills?" Are you asking what bills in particular or are you saying there are and always will be stupid bills? By stupid bills I ment stuff that the majority of citizens do not want but it still becomes law.

I am not saying that I should jump to arms if a bill passes that I disagree with all I am saying is that the second amendment keeps them from taking away other freedoms and trying to control our lives.

I believe that Mr Picker knew absolutely what you meant Arn, Then decided to twist it into something else by an obtuse interpretation of it for his own benefit. We see that alot now and especially in government.

We all love to be aghast at something I guess.

A really good example of making a point while being extremely dim is a cartoon I have seen of someone with the best armaments and firepower of 3 hundred years ago contrasted with someone with minimal armaments of the 20th century. I am still trying to understand it. But it matters not really, just someone that knows how tolerant we are.

Think they could make fun of some middle Eastern laws? Bet that is not the same "soft" target. May not get the same discussion even.

Sincerely,
Dave
 

dieselram94 said:
Um, where exactly did he say a citizen should take up arms against govt if they don't like a particular bill?
He didn't say "no stupid bills" he SAID "more stupid bills"
lets try not to just jump aboard someone because you want to stockpicker.....

Um ... "But with no guns the government can screw with us more, pass more stupid bills and try to do more stupid things since no one can fight back."
 

as fan of the real Spartans, look up their response when Persia threatened to invade greece
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom