How the world is going to end - according to super brains

DeepseekerADS

Gold Member
Mar 3, 2013
14,880
21,733
SW, VA - Bull Mountain
Detector(s) used
CTX, Excal II, EQ800, Fisher 1260X, Tesoro Royal Sabre, Tejon, Garrett ADSIII, Carrot, Stealth 920iX, Keene A52
Primary Interest:
Other
Science superheroes and famous thinkers form 'doomsday' society to save humanity from asteroids, pandemics - and itself | Mail Online

Killer robots and crippling cyber attacks: How the world is going to end - according to super brains such as Stephen Hawking

Members of a society, which includes Stephen Hawking and Robert May, will identify threats to humanity and devise ways of ensuring its survival
The Cambridge Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER) is led by the Astronomer Royal and Cambridge don Martin Rees
Lord Rees believes the main threats to sustained human existence now come from people, not from nature

By Nick Mcdermott, Science Reporter

PUBLISHED: 14:01 EST, 12 September 2013 | UPDATED: 18:40 EST, 12 September 2013

They are an improbable group of superheroes. But some of Britain's greatest minds have got together to focus their powers on saving humanity from itself.

Led by the Astronomer Royal and Cambridge don Martin Rees, famous thinkers such as physicist Stephen Hawking and former Government chief scientist Robert May have formed a society to draw up a doomsday list of risks that could wipe out mankind.

From crippling cyber-attacks by terrorists using the internet to cause havoc, to the release of engineered diseases and killer computers, they warn the future is far from rosy.
The society, which is led by Lord Rees, will look at natural catastrophes

The society, which is led by Lord Rees, will look at natural catastrophes like an asteroid hitting the Earth (illustrated) extreme weather events and pandemics, but he believes 'the main threats to sustained human existence now come from people, not from nature'

But the work being done by the Cambridge Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER) should one day help the world sleep a little easier at night.

Once the threats have been identified, the group intend to devise ways of 'ensuring our own species has a long-term future'.

Although nuclear annihilation and a giant asteroid obliterating the planet remain distinct, if unlikely possibilities, Lord Rees now believes 'the main threats to sustained human existence now come from people, not from nature.'

Other scenarios being considered by the 27-strong group, which also involves academics from Oxford, Imperial, Harvard and Berkeley, include extreme weather events, fast spreading pandemics, and war or sabotage resulting in a shortage of food and resources.

Speaking last night at the British Science Festival at the University of Newcastle, Lord Rees said: 'In future decades, events with low probability but catastrophic consequences may loom high on the political agenda.

Led by the Astronomer Royal Lord Rees, famous thinkers such as physicist Stephen Hawking (pictured) and former Government chief scientist Robert May have formed the Cambridge Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER) to draw up a doomsday list of risks that could wipe out mankind

'That's why some of us in Cambridge - both natural and social scientists - plan, with colleagues at Oxford and elsewhere, to inaugurate a research programme to compile a more complete register of these existential risks, and to assess how to enhance resilience against the more credible ones.'

He added: 'The response we've had to our proposal has been remarkably wide and remarkably positive.

'The project is still embryonic but we are seeking funds via various sources and have strengthened our international advisory network.'

The other two co-founders of CSER are Jann Tallinn, one of the people behind internet phone service Skype, and Cambridge philosopher Professor Huw Price.

The group's manifesto is clear: 'Many scientists are concerned that developments in human technology may soon pose new, extinction-level risks to our species as a whole.

'Our goal is to steer a small fraction of Cambridge's great intellectual resources and of the reputation built on its past and present scientific pre-eminence, to the task of ensuring that our own species has a long-term future.

Society member David Spiegelhalter warned we use interconnected systems for everything from power to food supply, which means there can be trouble if things go wrong. If the supply of food is disrupted it would take about 48-hours before it runs out and riots begin, he said

'In the process, we hope to make it a little more certain that we humans will be around to celebrate the University's own millennium, now less than two centuries hence.'

Cambridge statistician Professor David Spiegelhalter, who is also part of CSER, said: 'Asteroids crashing on earth are an existential threat, but there is not really a lot we can do about preventing such an event.

'The ones that we are not so well aware of are the technological threats.

Our reliance on technology leaves us vulnerable to it. We use interconnected systems for everything from power, to food supply and banking, which means there can be real trouble if things go wrong or they are sabotaged.

'In a modern, efficient world, we no longer stockpile food. If the supply is disrupted for any reason, it would take about 48-hours before it runs out and riots begin. So on a practical level, individuals should keep some non-perishable items at home.

'Energy security is also an issue, as we import much of our fuel from abroad, so a conflict over resources in the future is possible.'


THE END OF THE WORLD: RISKS , FROM EVIL COMPUTERS TO A VIRUS

The end of the world is nigh

Intelligent technology: A network of computers could develop a mind of its own. Machines could direct resources towards their own goals at the expense of human needs such as food and threaten mankind.

Cyber attacks: Power grids, air traffic control, banking and communications rely on interconnected computer systems. If these networks collapse due to action by enemy nations or terrorists, the paralysis could result in society breaking down.

Engineered infection:A man-made super virus or bacteria with no antidote escapes the lab or is released by terrorists. Millions die.

Food supply sabotage:Efficient distribution networks mean many Western nations have only 48 hours worth of food stockpiled. Any disruption would result in panic buying and riots.

Extreme weather: As the Earth continues to warm a tipping point is reached and the process snowballs, resulting in irreversible and worsening natural disasters.

Fast-spreading pandemic: International travel means a new killer virus, mutated from animals, could travel the globe in days, wiping out millions before a vaccine can be developed.

War: Growing populations put a strain on water and food resources. Nations will go to war to protect or capture these precious supplies.

Nuclear apocalypse: Nations with atom bombs launch targeted strikes leading to all-out warfare and global loss of life. Also fears nuclear warheads could fall into terrorist hands.

Asteroid impact: A giant asteroid is believed to have killed off the dinosaurs. Some fear a similar impact could do the same for mankind.
 

Fast-spreading pandemic: International travel means a new killer virus, mutated from animals,
could travel the globe in days, wiping out millions before a vaccine can be developed.

This would be my first choice, but it doesn't mean that humanity becomes extinct from
the Earth. Ma Nature has developed her own way of managing overpopulated species,
and either a superior predator will come on the scene (doubtful), or a new virus will
suddenly pop up, and it will be hundreds of millions (or more) that die from it. Could be
it takes an overwhelming percentage of human kind, leaving only those immune due to
some odd DNA. That's the way the overpopulation of any species on the planet has been
dealt with in the past.

The Earth will definitely be destroyed when our Sun begins to exhaust it's supply of
hydrogen, and begins to expand outward. You want "climate change"? Be here in
2-3 billion years ..it's gonna get a bit warm.

The amount of matter in the Universe is finite, and although Earth will be "destroyed",
the matter will simply be changed into something else, such as a gaseous state.
 

Last edited:
The amount of matter in the Universe is finite, and although Earth will be "destroyed",
the matter will simply be changed into something else, such as a gaseous state.

That's readily demonstrated by a dinner of pinto beans and cornbread :) :) :)
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top