Your welcome,Garabaldi said:Nice one Timekiller!!!Timekiller said:
Thank you.
On what grounds and whyCRUSADER said:Timekiller said:
disagree with the date on the link but the rest is right
Sorry,Silver Searcher said:I'm not arguing...but that could change, I asked a traight forward question thats all..kin hellCRUSADER said:Silver Searcher said:On what grounds and whyCRUSADER said:Timekiller said:
disagree with the date on the link but the rest is right
On the same grounds you like to argue
CRUSADER said:Sorry,Silver Searcher said:I'm not arguing...but that could change, I asked a traight forward question thats all..kin hellCRUSADER said:Silver Searcher said:On what grounds and whyCRUSADER said:Timekiller said:
disagree with the date on the link but the rest is right
On the same grounds you like to argue
going mental, thought I remembered reading late 18th C, just checked in 3 books & they all agree about 1670-1715, so Gordon was right I was a nobber
I will delete my jumping down your throat
What is interesting is that it either takes the site way back further than the buckle pictured, or its been reused/antique furniture travelling across the sea,,,, interesting
I was thinking the same thing Crusader? I found it at a cellar hole in the woods, so maybe the colonial guy lived a really really long time.CRUSADER said:Sorry,Silver Searcher said:I'm not arguing...but that could change, I asked a traight forward question thats all..kin hellCRUSADER said:Silver Searcher said:On what grounds and whyCRUSADER said:Timekiller said:
disagree with the date on the link but the rest is right
On the same grounds you like to argue
going mental, thought I remembered reading late 18th C, just checked in 3 books & they all agree about 1670-1715, so Gordon was right I was a nobber
I will delete my jumping down your throat
What is interesting is that it either takes the site way back further than the buckle pictured, or its been reused/antique furniture travelling across the sea,,,, interesting