Well, it might be meteoritic, but I have some observations.
If āNebulaā is the company that packaged this up then itās not one Iāve heard of as an established supplier of meteorites. It could however be one of many companies that supplies geological and other curiosities to āgem and beadā gift shops. Those kinds of items have usually been bulk-purchased from Morocco and have various degrees of authenticity/reliability in terms of identification.
I find it extremely odd that someone would go to the trouble of packaging it so nicely without any indication of the location where it was found or what kind of meteorite it might be. Even if it is meteoritic, a collector would have little interest in it on that basis. The āmeteorite factsā on the label are all over the place. Looks like 'out of context' information that has been found with a bit of Googling by someone who has no understanding of what they were looking at.
For starters itās not an āindividualā. That term is reserved for a meteorite that arrives as part of a shower, or from disintegration of a larger meteorite during atmospheric passage, which represents a discrete mass (and with primary and/or secondary fusion crust over its entire surface.) Not a section cut from something larger, which this one clearly is. To say itās a ānebula meteoriteā is pretty meaningless. All dust and gas clouds that condensed into primitive protoplanetary material which ultimately reaches us as meteorites has its origin in a solar nebula.
There is no way that it can be claimed to be 4.565 billion years old (to three decimal places), or that it travelled 400 million km from the asteroid belt at 176,000 km/hr unless it has been precisely typed and attributed. All of those values would be dependent on knowing exactly what it isā¦ and theyāre not even ātypical averageā numbers.
Regarding the appearance, there are no obvious chondrules and no evidence of shiny metal on the cut surface. It might be a piece of a brecciated chondrite which has partially melted and then heavily weathered after arrival. In that case, a generic Saharan/NWA origin would be probable. To me, what it most resembles is meteoritic iron which has seen terrestrial alteration and largely converted to iron shale. That kind of material is commonly found at large impact sites such as Canyon Diablo in Arizona or Wolfe Creek in Australia. Iāve seen it in Nantan specimens from China too and some Saharan/NWA material.