Georgia Joins SC-Legislators Introducing Bill to Nullify Obamacare

Treasure_Hunter

Administrator
Staff member
Jul 27, 2006
49,412
57,606
Florida
Detector(s) used
Minelab_Equinox_ 800 Minelab_CTX-3030 Minelab_Excal_1000 Minelab_Sovereign_GT Minelab_Safari Minelab_ETrac Whites_Beach_Hunter_ID Fisher_1235_X
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Legislators Introducing Bill to Nullify Obamacare in Georgia


Four state representatives announced yesterday that they are introducing legislation to block Obamacare in Georgia.

State representative Jason Spencer (R-Woodbine), with three other representatives, will hold a press conference on Monday, Dec. 16 to discuss the proposal.

In a press release, Rep. Spencer explained the bill’s goal:

“The bill’s main thrust is to prohibit state agencies, officers and employees of the state from implementing any provisions of the Affordable Care Act, leaving implementation entirely in the hands of the federal government, which lacks the resources or personnel to carry out the programs it mandates.”

Michael Boldin of the Tenth Amendment Center explained the legal grounds for state nullification of Obamacare, and the possibility of other states following suit:

Based on the long-standing legal principle, the anti-commandeering doctrine, the legislation is on strong legal grounds. In four major cases from 1842 to 2012, the Supreme Court has consistently held that the federal government cannot “commandeer” states, requiring them to enforce or expend resources to participate in federal law or regulatory programs.

Tenth Amendment Center (TAC) national communications director Mike Maharrey suggested that a large-scale effort would be coming in 2014. “Kudos goes out to all the people in South Carolina who have worked the past year to get things this far. And kudos to Jason Spencer for stepping up to support their effort. Our contacts here at the Center tell us to expect at least ten other states considering similar legislation in 2014, but it’s going to require people getting on the phone with their state reps and senators to make that happen.”

Maharrey said that TAC’s state-plan to nullify Obamacare includes four key parts. The main part, as bills in South Carolina and Georgia are proposing, would ban the state from enforcing or providing material support for the enforcement of the Affordable Care Act. The plan also includes a rejection of the Medicaid expansion, steps to reduce the impact and enforcement of the mandate tax, and press for an ongoing challenge to the taxes themselves.

“Each piece might seem like a small piece of thread,” said Maharrey. “But when you tie all kinds of threads together you have a strong piece of rope. By refusing to comply in multiple states and various areas, we’re going to pull the rug right out from under Obamacare.”

South Carolina fast-tracked a bill entitled “South Carolina Freedom of Health Care Protection Act” (H.3101), the basis of which is the anti-commandeering doctrine:

“Congress can pass laws, but it cannot compel the states to utilize either their treasury or personnel to implement those federal laws,”explained state Sen. Tom Davis.

The Tenth Amendment Center has outlined the steps to follow to nullify the Affordable Care Act at the state level. Several other states have introduced legislation to nullify the law, and perhaps South Carolina and Georgia will inspire more to do the same.

Legislators Introducing Bill to Nullify Obamacare in Georgia |


We will NOT go quietly into the night!
 

Last edited:
Just like some people in CA want to nullify the mining law of 1872...
 

Just like some people in CA want to nullify the mining law of 1872...

You keep trotting this out like a kitten with a dead mouse?

If the majority of the Cali Loons want to impoverish their own state or otherwise restrict their citizens freedom, why is that a big deal? As long as they still allow people to leave.

But that doesn't have much to do with Georgia's efforts to protect it's citizens.. Go Georgia!
 

I am always amused by some of the people posting here who are not moderators who think they are in some magical way in control of what others post, and never miss an opportunity to comment along those lines. I just laugh.
 

Last edited:
I am bemused by your amusement. Aren't you the one always saying a post has nothing to do with a thread? Lol
 

Just like some people in CA want to nullify the mining law of 1872...

Matt, they are making it illegal under state law for any state employee to assist Federal government in administering lucifercare..

Supreme court has already ruled Feds can not force state employees to do any work of any kind on any Federal regulatory program....They are not Nullifying lucifercare, only the ability to administer it with any state employees or state funds....

Totally legal.....

We will NOT go quietly into the night!
 

Last edited:
I say good for Georgia. Maybe this will start a trend. An avalanche begins as a snowball. People who think Obamacare is a good idea are simply not looking at it from a common sense standpoint. Nearly EVERY time the government gets involved in something the cost goes way up. It's not a conspiracy, it's just common sense. Look at it like a corporation. Suddenly the corporation hires thousands of new people to oversee how things are done. Those people have to get paid. The consumer ends up being the one to foot the bill. Involving the government is 10 times worse because of the pure waste they generate. The huge mistake the Republicans made was to drag O-care into the budget discussions a couple months ago. It hurt them in the polls. They should have done nothing and just let it crash & burn on it's own like it's doing now.
 

Last edited:
Way to go Georgia!!! Hoping common sense comes back into style.
 

Treasure Hunter:

So the headline is not correct?

Good luck to all,

~ The Old Bookaroo

OB it isn't rocket science, I am positive you know what it means. If the states don't help administer lucifercare they are in effect Nullifying it since feds do not have the man power resources to do so....

We will NOT go quietly into the night!
 

Treasure Hunter:

I don't agree with you on that - but, time will tell. I remember when some states told the Federal government they would not enforce a 55 mph speed limit. I never did see the FBI writing tickets. Yet...

Good luck to all,

~ The Old Bookaroo
 

Treasure Hunter:

I don't agree with you on that - but, time will tell. I remember when some states told the Federal government they would not enforce a 55 mph speed limit. I never did see the FBI writing tickets. Yet...

Good luck to all,

~ The Old Bookaroo
No, what the feds did instead was threaten things like cutting off federal highway funding. In NH the feds tried the same tactics to force NH into making helmet laws for motorcycles mandatory, seat belts mandatory, emissions inspections mandatory, car insurance mandatory. Guess what ? NH told them to stick their money where the sun don't shine and other than the emissions inspections they still don't have any of the other things. I'm sure you'll come back with "but we NEED all those things"... BS. We NEED the government to stop trying to control every single breath we take. Helmet laws ? Seatbelt laws ? Know why ? Because big insurance companies give tons of money to politicians in return for passing laws that save them money. But they are protecting people from bad things right ? We should probably outlaw sky diving, walking in the woods in bear country, swimming in water where sharks might be, walking on the side of any public road with a speed limit over 5mph, & on & on right ?
 

Last edited:
Treasure Hunter:

I don't agree with you on that - but, time will tell. I remember when some states told the Federal government they would not enforce a 55 mph speed limit. I never did see the FBI writing tickets. Yet...

Good luck to all,

~ The Old Bookaroo

OB are you serious, your comparing lucifercare to 55 speed limit? Do you remember any states passing state laws to block the 55 limit?

Was that law causing millions of citizens to lose their car insurance and being forced to buy Gov car insurance?

Liberals don't have to like it, but states have the right to refuse to support with state funds or man power any federal regulatory program they want to per Supreme Court ruling...


We will NOT go quietly into the night!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top