FLORIDA LAW JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE

Treasure_Hunter

Administrator
⛮ Administrator
⛭ Moderator
🥇 Charter Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
49,763
Reaction score
58,683
Golden Thread
0
Location
Florida
Detector(s) used
Minelab_Equinox_ 800 Minelab_CTX-3030 Minelab_Excal_1000 Minelab_Sovereign_GT Minelab_Safari Minelab_ETrac Whites_Beach_Hunter_ID Fisher_1235_X
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
To inform the uninformed...


The 2012 Florida Statutes


Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 776
JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE
View Entire Chapter
776.013 

Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.—

(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:

(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and

(b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.

(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:

(a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or

(b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or

(c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or

(d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer.

(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

(4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.

(5) As used in this section, the term:

(a) “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night.

(b) “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.

(c) “Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.


http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes...ing&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.013.html


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

Thank you for not writing this in Cursive Some that vote would not have been able to read it.
 

Thanks for posting this TH. It is a good law.
 

Thank you for not writing this in Cursive Some that vote would not have been able to read it.

I think that some who vote still cant read it.Better take it down a few more notches TH to the see spot run level.:laughing7:
 

Thank you for posting the law at its source. It is helpful info to know.

Onfire and RJC: Were the backhanded insults necessary? I think posting the info was enough. Your comments are VERY telling...
 

Onfire and RJC: Were the backhanded insults necessary? I think posting the info was enough. Your comments are VERY telling..

Youre right ben,our comments are and were very telling,both comments tell the truth.>>>>Wake up.<<<<
 

Thank you for posting the law at its source. It is helpful info to know.

Onfire and RJC: Were the backhanded insults necessary? I think posting the info was enough. Your comments are VERY telling...

Who you protecting? And just do my comments tell Maybe I'm just fed up with being quite Just because I'm a white A$$ cracker .doesn't mean I need to shut up.
 

One thing is for sure I will never stop doing the right thing...

Sent from my SCH-R930 using Tapatalk 2
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top